Francis now Shows clealry he is an anti-Christ!

 

 

 While the uproar about Francis statements that says that Christians should apologize to gays, for discrimination, we should not forget also that he agreed with the arch heretic, Martin Luther, essentially showing again that he is of the devil, just like Luther!

According to Francis on his plane back from Armenia,

 

Church “must ask Forgiveness” of Homosexuals because “Who are we to Judge?!”.

 

 “Martin Luther “did not err” on Justification; “All of us are Saints, because all of us have the Holy Spirit”

Francis officially says that he is in the same boat with Martin Luther, the man that says that Faith alone is what saves!

 

He is NOW clearly preaching the same heresy Martin Luther preached and which was condemned by the Council of Trent!

 

Francis says that his religion, the evil Novus ordo Religion believes the same thing!

 

Here is the full excerpts of what Francis said!

 

Please read carefully and note in particular the Red:

 

[Tilmann] Kleinjung [questioner]: Too much beer … Holy Father, I wanted to ask you a question. Today you spoke of the gifts of the shared Churches, of the gifts shared by the Churches together. Seeing that you will go in I believe four months to Lund for the commemoration of the 500th anniversary of the reformation, I think perhaps this is also the right moment for us not only to remember the wounds on both sides but also to recognize the gifts of the reformation. Perhaps also – this is a heretical question – perhaps to annul or withdraw the excommunication of Martin Luther or of some sort of rehabilitation. Thank you.

 

Pope Francis: I think that the intentions of Martin Luther were not mistaken. He was a reformer. Perhaps some methods were not correct.

 

But in that time, if we read the story of the Pastor, a German Lutheran who then converted when he saw reality – he became Catholic – in that time, the Church was not exactly a model to imitate.

 

There was corruption in the Church, there was worldliness, attachment to money, to power...and this he protested. Then he was intelligent and took some steps forward justifying, and because he did this. And today Lutherans and Catholics, Protestants, all of us agree on the doctrine of justification. On this point, which is very important, he did not err.

 

 

 He made a medicine for the Church, but then this medicine consolidated into a state of things, into a state of a discipline, into a way of believing, into a way of doing, into a liturgical way and he wasn’t alone; there was Zwingli, there was Calvin, each one of them different, and behind them were who? Principals! We must put ourselves in the story of that time. It’s a story that’s not easy to understand, not easy. Then things went forward, and today the dialogue is very good.

That document of justification I think is one of the richest ecumenical documents in the world, one in most agreement. But there are divisions, and these also depend on the Churches. In Buenos Aires there were two Lutheran churches, and one thought in one way and the other...even in the same Lutheran church there was no unity; but they respected each other, they loved each other, and the difference is perhaps what hurt all of us so badly and today we seek to take up the path of encountering each other after 500 years. I think that we have to pray together, pray. Prayer is important for this. Second, to work together for the poor, for the persecuted, for many people, for refugees, for the many who suffer; to work together and pray together and the theologians who study together try...but this is a long path, very long. One time jokingly I said: I know when full unity will happen. - “when?” - “the day after the Son of Man comes,” because we don’t know...the Holy Spirit will give the grace, but in the meantime, praying, loving each other and working together. Above all for the poor, for the people who suffer and for peace and many things...against the exploitation of people and many things in which they are jointly working together.

(“Full text: Pope Francis' in-flight press conference from Armenia”, Catholic News Agency, Click here)

Presented by Malachy Igwilo, within the octave of the Nativity of John the Baptist, 27th June, 2016

 

Latest on anti Pope Francis: Anti Pope Francis keep suggesting that Marriage can be dispensed with!

According to Francis: “Great Majority” of Marriages today are Invalid, “Fidelity” in Cohabitation = Real Marriage!

Francis simply cannot keep his jaws together. This is actually a grace for all who seek the truth, because the more he speaks, the more evident it becomes that there is not a single Catholic bone in this man’s body.

On Thursday, June 16, the “Holy Father” answered impromptu questions from the audience after a pastoral congress in the diocese of Rome. One question centered on the crisis in holy matrimony, to which Francis gave an explosive answer. Catholic News Agency has the story:

 

A layman asked about the “crisis of marriage” and how Catholics can help educate youth in love, help them learn about sacramental marriage, and help them overcome “their resistance, delusions and fears.”

The Pope answered from his own experience.

“I heard a bishop say some months ago that he met a boy that had finished his university studies, and said ‘I want to become a priest, but only for 10 years.’ It’s the culture of the provisional. And this happens everywhere, also in priestly life, in religious life,” he said.

“It’s provisional, and because of this the great majority of our sacramental marriages are null. Because they say ‘yes, for the rest of my life!’ but they don’t know what they are saying. Because they have a different culture. They say it, they have good will, but they don’t know.”

…

Pope Francis attributed the marriage crisis to people who “don’t know what the sacrament is” and don’t know “the beauty of the sacrament.”

“They don’t know that it’s indissoluble, they don’t know that it’s for your entire life. It’s hard,” the Pope said.

He added that a majority of couples attending marriage prep courses in Argentina typically cohabitated.

“They prefer to cohabitate, and this is a challenge, a task. Not to ask ‘why don’t you marry?’ No, to accompany, to wait, and to help them to mature, help fidelity to mature.”

...

“It’s a superstition, because marriage frightens the husband. It’s a superstition we have to overcome,” the Pope said. “I’ve seen a lot of fidelity in these cohabitations, and I am sure that this is a real marriage, they have the grace of a real marriage because of their fidelity, but there are local superstitions, etc.”

“Marriage is the most difficult area of pastoral work,” he said.

(“Most marriages today are invalid, Pope Francis suggests”, Catholic News Agency, June 16, 2016; underlining added.)

 

Wow! This is so bad, it’s hard to know where to begin. 

Let’s start with a quick note on the headline used by Catholic News Agency, which is misleading: “Most marriages today are invalid, Pope Francis suggests”. No, Francis didn’t suggest that most marriages today are invalid, he said it outright. But perhaps this harsh truth was a bit too much to take even for the Novus Ordo reporters at the news agency and so they tried to tone it down.

In any case, Francis declares that the “great majority” of sacramental marriages are invalid. What’s a great majority? Seventy percent, maybe eighty? That’s a lot of marriages. We’re not talking about pseudo-marriages, where one or both would-be spouses are already married to someone else whom they “divorced” — we’re talking about marriages where husband and wife were actually eligible to marry in the first place and freely joined this holy union. Francis states nonchalantly that most of them are invalid. Precisely how does he know that? He doesn’t, of course — he made it up. And by him asserting it to be so, he has just ensured that tens of thousands of additional requests for annulments will be submitted in the months to come, to tear apart even more families under the guise of “mercy”.

Francis’ own attempt at a justification for his outrageous and gratuitous assertion that “most” marriages today are invalid, is that even though people pledge “until death do us part” in their solemn wedding vows, they don’t mean it. They don’t mean it because they “don’t know” — even though they are saying the words, in their very own vernacular language, in what is probably the most solemn moment in their entire life.

You have got to be kidding.

 

 

Bye Bye Matrimony

 

This is a really curious new principle Francis is underhandedly introducing here: We can no longer assume that people mean what they say, even in something so solemn as the very marriage vow on their wedding day! The reason why is simple for him: culture! There, that’s it. In today’s “culture”, words don’t mean what they mean. It’s all so provisional, you see, nothing is permanent anymore — heck, even the “Pope” resigns when he feels like it!

But there is more to be found here than a mere absurdity: Francis is undermining a fundamental principle of sacramental theology, which is that of the presumption of validity, a legal presumption that the necessary internal intention to confect the sacrament (to “do what the Church does”) is present in the minister when the matter and form of the sacramental rite have been properly applied — unless there is externally manifested evidence to the contrary:

A person who has correctly and seriously used the requisite matter and form to effect and confer a sacrament is presumed for that very reason to have intended to do what the Church does. 

(Pope Leo XIII, Bull Apostolicae Curae, n. 33)

Provided the minister seriously performs all the sacramental rites, there is no need for being doubtful about the validity of the sacraments, for it is presumed that the minister has the requisite intention, unless he externalty manifests the contrary.

(Rev. Raphael De Salvo, The Dogmatic Theology on the Intention of the Minister in the Confection of the Sacraments [Washington, D.C.: CUA Press, 1949], p. 105)

In Holy Matrimony, the ministers of the sacrament are the two spouses, who confer the sacrament on each other. The matter is, remotely, the right over the other’s body for the purpose of procreation and, proximately, the transfer of that right by signs and words. The form of the sacrament is the consent to that right, expressed in the marriage vow, which ends in “until death do us part” (see Rev. Henry Davis, Moral and Pastoral Theology, vol. 4 [New York, NY: Sheed & Ward, 1935], p. 62). The sacrament of Holy Matrimony is indissoluble by its very nature and necessarily lasts until the death of one of the spouses.

But what about Francis’ casual claim that people “don’t know” what they’re saying while exchanging matrimonial consent? Believe it or not, the Catholic Church had already considered that scenario before Jorge Bergoglio ever came on the scene. The following excerpt from the great canon law professor Fr. Henry Ayrinhac deals a devastating and fatal blow to the latest Bergoglian poppycock:

 

190. § 1. In order that matrimonial consent be possible it is necessary that the contracting parties at least be not lacking in the knowledge that marriage is the permanent union of man and woman for the procreation of children.

§ 2. Such ignorance is not presumed in those who have attained the age of puberty. 

1. We can not consent to what we do not know; the marriage consent is not possible without some, at least confused, knowledge of what constitutes the essential object of the marriage contract; and this is the mutual right and obligation to the conjugal act: ... Hence a person who would marry without having any idea of that right and obligation would not marry validly. Clear and explicit knowledge is not necessary. If one, knowing that the purpose of marriage is the procreation of children, would enter the contract with that in view and would consent to all it implies, although having no distinct idea of what is required for generation, there would be confused knowledge of, and consent to, what constitutes the essential object of the contract, and the marriage would be valid; even if the party was so disposed that if he knew what the act of generation really is, he would not give his consent. But at least that confused knowledge of the substantial object of the contract is necessary.

191. 2. Ignorance of the primary purpose of marriage is easily admitted in children. In the ancient legislation it was always presumed before the age of puberty; after that age, on the contrary, knowledge is presumed. The presumption admits of proofs to the contrary, but it would require strong evidence to obtain the annulment of a marriage on the ground of ignorance in a person of age to marry….

…

198. A simple error as to the unity, indiasolubility, or sacramental character of marriage, even if it be cause of the contract, does not vitiate the consent. Error as to the essential object of the contract vitiates the consent, like ignorance. Error as to the essential properties does not, as long as it remains simply an error of the mind, whether antecedent or concomitant. Thus, a man who intends to form a real contract of marriage, although he does not believe in its indissolubility or sacredness, will be married validly, provided he does not exclude those properties by a positive act of the will, even though he would exclude them if he thought of it. His consent is directed expressly to the marriage contract and by way of consequence to the properties which are inseparable from it. His prevailing intention is to contract marriage; his views on the properties of marriage are errors in the mind which do not affect the primary object of the will. If, however, he would exclude those properties and make that exclusion the primary object of his will, this then would prevail over his intention of marrying and the consent would be vitiated, because one can not will marriage without willing an indissoluble union. But this requires more than a theoretical error; it supposes a positive act of the will, placing a condition, making consent depend on something else than the substantial element of the contract. That positive act is a fact which must be proved and is not presumed. Hence the difficulty of annulling a marriage on the ground of error as to quality…

…

[200.] 1. When a contracting party utters externally and seriously words expressing consent, he is supposed [=understood] to consent internally. His consent is supposed to be absolute if it is expressed absolutely. “Nobody is to be considered as having said what was not on his mind.” This, however, is only a presumption, and if in reality the internal consent was wanting, no matter what the external words might have been, the contract would be null in itself and before God.

 

(Rev. H. A. Ayrinhac, Marriage Legislation in the New Code of Canon Law [New York, NY: Benziger Brothers, 1919], pp. 191-192; 196-197; 199; underlining added.)

 

The 1917 Code of Canon Law underscores the firmness of the presumption of validity in a sacramental marriage: “Marriage enjoys the favor of the law; therefore, in case of doubt, its validity ought to be maintained until the contrary be proved…” (Canon 1014). Notice it says “proved”, not, “until Francis decides otherwise.”

Fr. Ayrinhac reminds us how serious this matter is:

It is a general principle that when an act has been performed it ought to be considered valid until it is proved to be null. This applies in a special manner to marriage, which is a sacrament and indissoluble by divine law. To pronounce a marriage null without sufficient evidence is to run the risk of “setting asunder what God has put together.”

(Ayrinhac, Marriage Legislation, p. 25)

Francis is finished.

By the way, how is it that Francis can “lament” now with a straight face the fact that people are clueless about the nature and beauty of holy matrimony when it is precisely his beloved Modernist Vatican II Sect that has been educating the “Catholic” masses in the last five decades? Haven’t we been hearing, ad nauseam, something about “Great Renewal” and “New Springtime” since Vatican II? What happened?!

In any case, we have seen that the true Catholic teaching is that even if people do not know about or believe in the indissolubility of marriage, as long as they intend to enter the matrimonial union, their marriage is valid, unless they make a positive act of the will not to enter into a union that is indissoluble — and even that positive will, if not externally manifested, would have to be proved, not presumed, before a valid annulment could be issued.

But notice how devious the Argentinian impostor pope is: He is carrying out his subversion of holy matrimony and of the presumption of sacramental validity under the guise of lamenting a crisis in marriage, when the truth is that by these remarks, Bergoglio is exacerbating the crisis by colossal proportions.

Here we might add that it was Francis himself who, in September 2015, opened the bogus “annulment” floodgates even further, when he overhauled and “streamlined” Novus Ordo marriage annulments, which were already being given out like popcorn:

Motu Inapproprio: Francis overhauls Marriage “Annulments”

 

In his two motu proprio documents, Francis not only made receiving a declaration of nullity easier, faster, and free, he also added unheard-of new grounds for considering a marriage null and void, such as “brief conjugal cohabitation”, “defect of faith”, and “abortion procured to avoid procreation”! But not enough, for we can now add a new one to the list: “not meaning the marriage vow when you say it”! And this man wants people to think he is bewailing how many invalid marriages there are? Whom is he kidding?!

 

They think they’re married! But not to worry: Francis’ annulment factory is waiting in the wings in case it doesn’t “work out”…

But alas, we are not done yet, for the monster Jesuit from Argentina knows how to add insult to injury. Right after shedding crocodile tears over the terrible matrimonial ignorance which afflicts “the great majority” of people who think they’re validly married, Francis launches his next attack on truth and decency by claiming that cohabitating fornicators in marriage prep courses ought not to be told the truth about marriage: “They prefer to cohabitate, and this is a challenge, a task. Not to ask ‘why don’t you marry?’ No, to accompany, to wait, and to help them to mature, help fidelity to mature.”

So there we have it: This is precisely the reason — one of them, that is — why so many people in Francis’ religion are clueless about marriage: because they are never told by those who ought to tell them. And Francis is going to do all in his power to ensure that it will stay this way! He is the kind of man who first creates a problem, then bewails that the problem exists, and then offers more of the problem as the solution.

Instead of telling cohabitators in marriage preparation that they must separate and refrain from all sexual relations until they are married as a precondition to be even allowed to get married — how’s that for helping someone understand the beauty and uniqueness and exalted state of holy matrimony! — Francis proposes his cure-all of pastoral “accompaniment”, a term left, of course, conveniently undefined.

But it gets better: Francis claims that the cohabitating fornicators possess “fidelity” (!) which needs but “mature”! There goes the Novus Ordo doctrine of “elements” again: We now have “elements of marital fidelity” in two people who are habitually engaging in mortal sin against the Sixth Commandment, all in the spirit of Amoris Laetitia! At least we now finally know what Bergoglio meant in his 2010 book On Heaven and Earth, which he co-authored with Rabbi Abraham Skorka, when he said that “co-habitation certainly does not have the fullness, or the greatness of marriage” (p. 116). It sure doesn’t. But it won’t matter, because… accompaniment! 

But we’re still not done — Francis tops himself yet again: “I’ve seen a lot of fidelity in these cohabitations, and I am sure that this is a real marriage, they have the grace of a real marriage because of their fidelity…” This is blasphemy!

Francis says here openly and without shame that in some cases of fornication — namely, when the two partners are particularly attached to each other in this mortal sin — God blesses them for their sin and rewards them with the “grace of a real marriage”! This is foul and disgusting beyond words! “Woe to you that call evil good, and good evil: that put darkness for light, and light for darkness: that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter” (Is 5:20)!

Words fail at the sight of such brazen and direct identification of evil with good!

At the same time, this frightful utterance is but Francis’ re-application of the same blasphemy once spoken by “Pope” John Paul II, who claimed that it is God Himself who is responsible for the firmness with which non-Christians adhere to their false religions: “...the firm belief of the followers of the non-Christian religions [is] a belief that is also an effect of the Spirit of truth operating outside the visible confines of the Mystical Body…” (Antipope John Paul II, Encyclical Redemptor Hominis, n. 6). Francis simply took the essence of John Paul II’s thesis and applied it to fornication. Voilà! Different scenario, same blasphemy — brought to you by the same Novus Ordo religion.

Of course, fornicators cannot practice fidelity because fidelity (“faithfulness”) refers to the marriage vow — you know, that little bit of text you said on your wedding day when you promised fidelity to your spouse “until death do us part”. If you meant it, that is.

As we explained in our in-depth podcast covering Amoris Laetitia, for Francis there is no essential difference between holy matrimony and fornication, between vice and virtue, between holiness and sin, between truth and error, between God and the devil. When a man and a woman sin long enough exclusively with one other, this constitutes a “real marriage” for Jorge Bergoglio. This is where we’re at. Let this sink in for a minute.

As we said in a recent post, Francis has completely done away with black and white — everything isnow fifty shades of grey! The Novus Ordo Church is a sect straight from the pit of hell. Francis really couldn’t make it any clearer.

And to answer right up front the question Jimmy Akin’s next blog post will ask in its title: Yes, Jimmy, he did.

 

News from www.novusordowatch.com

 

Presented by Malachy Mary Igwilo in the year of Our Lord, 17th June 2016

Related Posts;

Does Francis remain "pope" are his "tome of Sin"? For you?

Welcome to the church of Mortal sin!

A list of heretical pronouncements of Francis

“Pope” Benedict XVI continues to lie to the world about Fatima!

While some people foolishly say that Josef Ratzinger was a good pope in the Catholic Church, evidence to the contrary abounds! Josef Ratzinger, who claimed to be Pope Benedict XVI is nothing but a red eyed heretic who is never a Catholic and was NEVER pope!

We know this because a heretic can never become pope! Ratzinger denied  Resurrection of Christ in his book “Jesus of Nazareth”, He denied the resurrection of the Body, an article in the Apostles Creed, He denied that ONLY Christ can save and believes that Jews are saved without Christ, he eulogizes false religions like Islam and Hinduism thereby suggesting that these need not convert to the one true Church, He refused to believe in conversion to the Catholic Church by non-Catholics, he believes that it is possible for consecration can take place at Mass without the actual words of consecration, he rejected infant baptism, he rejected real presence of Christ in Blessed Sacrament calling it “a limiting of God”. 

Infact, Benedict XVI’s heresies are too many that he is truly an apostate not just a heretic!

But the subject of this article is to draw attention to his latest shameless lies. As I wrote the other time, here:

showing that the Secret of Fatima released under anti-Pope John Paul II through Ratzinger and Bertone was a fake, evidences have emerged that indeed what was released back then in 2000 was a lie or at lest not the complete truth.

The web page One PeterFive (this is not and endorsement of 1Peter5) reported that a certain “Fr”. Dollinger, a “priest” professor in his old age and who is a personal friend of Ratzinger revealed that Ratzinger told him that there is more to the Third Secret that was not revealed. This elicited an “I know it” response from Fatimatists world wide who have always believed that the Third Secrete of Fatima revel by the Vatican in 2000 was a fake.

As this new was sinking in, the Vatican responded and denied everything claiming that Benedict XVI himself has denied he ever told “Fr” Dollinger anything about Fatima Secrete still remaining. The Vatican called Dollinger statement a “complete fabrication”!

 The Writer of the story, Dr. Maike Hickson, in One PeterFive placed a call to “Fr” Dollinger to confirm what he said earlier in the light of the response from the Vatican. Again, “Fr” Dollinger repeated himself insisting that Ratzinger told him that the secret was not completely revealed!

In the face of this claim and counter claim, who could be lying? The truth is Ratzinger is the liar here.

What “Fr” Dollinger said is not new. He had said it before telling the world that Ratzinger said that the Secret is still remaining. He said this many years ago when Benedict XVI himself was pontificating as the pope! Why didn’t Vatican issue a denial statement then? Even “Fr”. Paul Kramer, a known Fatima Advocate, reported the same in his article for the magazine, Fatima Crusader in 2009. Why didn’t the Vatican deny it then?

Also Benedict XVI while travelling to Fatima in 2010 said that in the Third secrete there was a mention of the “passion of the Church” and this is gradually taking shape! This idea was not part of the so called secret revealed in 2000. This means that indeed there remains a part of the third secret not revealed!

Again while at Fatima, on May 13^th 2010, the same Benedict XVI said “we would be mistaken to think that Fatima’s prophetic mission is complete”.

This means that indeed there is a secret remaining! We should remember that the secrete that was revealed by Ratzinger and Bertone under John Paul II suggested that the Secrete is about the 1981 shooting of John Paul II. If this is true, what does Benedict XVI mean by the above statement?

It simply means that Benedict XVI, apart from being an apostate, is a liar of the first degree!

First Our Lady will not come to Fatima to warn the world about the shooting of John Paul II in 1981 and said the secret should be revealed in 1960 so that the world will understand it better. This lie is known by the main propagators of Fatima worldwide.

Also, Ratzinger kept lying by suggesting that we will be mistaken if we thought the secret is complete. Yes. The secret is ongoing. But Ratinger did not reveal it making him a liar.

So, when Dollinger told One Peter Five about what Ratzinger told him personally and which was denied by Ratzinger, it shows again that Ratzinger is a liar and keep lying in his old age!

Ask yourself, how can a very old man who calls himself Benedict XVI be lying and remaining in his apostasy as he is apparently nearing his end?

This is what we do not know! Perhaps he has decided to die on the side of the devil instead of coming clean now by revealing the true secret and rejecting all his heresies publicly!

Those who keep calling him a Catholic should indeed be ashamed.

By Malachy Mary Igwilo, given on 23^rd May 2016

A Crash History of Demonic Possession!

In Christian Cosmology, it is believed that there was war in heaven 100 billion billon years ago(if we can indeed calculate such things)  when an Influential angel called Lucifer challenged the plan of the Almighty God to someday make angels adore a woman, a human being, as Mother of God!

This sounded like pure nonsense to Lucifer who controlled legions of angels numbering many billions! His own control of these angels was because he has a special gift for singing and composing of songs in praise of God and so he was called the son of light from where his name was derived! The main problem was how can he, Lucifer, son of the morning light bow down and obey a human being and a woman for that matter? Another reason why he was astounded is that he failed to grasp the reason that will make them adore this woman and what the woman will do!

If you know about angels in Christian cosmology you will know they are grouped in 7 groups, the archangels, thrones, Dominions, principalities, powers, cherubim and seraphim. Each of these groups is made up of billions of angels all dedicated to the pleasure of God.

So Lucifer moved round each group asking to know if anyone can decipher what is in the offing since he was not told. Many of those he asked were angry and some were ambivalent. But each liked Lucifer since his 10 billion angel choir was derived from the 7 groups.

After some times, Lucifer could stand it no more! He went to the archangels. These archangels are just 7 in number and they stand before the throne of God directly doing His almighty bidden and Lucifer is the 8^th angel that comes and goes from the direct presence of God. The names of the archangels are Michael, Gabriel, Raphael, Sealtiel, Jehudiel, Barachiel, and Lechtiel. Even the archangels were clueless except Michael who is really the head of the archangels and had a slight premonition of what is to happen but have no details.

Lucifer entered the presence of God and started to cry and weep challenging God, showing his disappointment that such a great event is in the offing and no one told him and God was not about to tell him. 

He was angry.

He stormed out of the presence of God and organized the members of his choir to start a rebellion in heaven. 

He figured that he can defeat God since his powers were really immense and he knows everything God seemed to know. He knew every corner and content of creations and what is yet to be created, or so he thought. So he wanted to subdue God and take over heaven. Billions of angels supported this rebellion. Even many angels saw the huge gathering of angels from the 7 groups, they were afraid. Some billions of them decided to sit on the fence and to support whoever will win the coming battle.

At this juncture, Michael the archangel wept before God at the total insult against the Majesty of the Almighty. The subject of his cry was “who is like God” that any person will dare challenge him? So the almighty gave him unusual powers to fight against the rebelling angels. From then on his name meant “who is like God”.

Michael set out to organize his own people(angels). When the legions of angels sighted Michael dressed for battle, there were shouts of joy among the faithful angels. They all quickly dressed for the huge battle.

When the battle started, Lucifer himself was shocked to see the ferocity of Michael’s camp. Michael was not looking normal at all. He seemed extended and larger in appearance as if he was possessed by a force unknown to Lucifer. Lucifer knew that he may have made a mistake waging this war against God. But it was too late! His knowledge of God and his capabilities was limited. He immediately contemplated defeat but also wondered what will really happen to him since the angels are immortal beings but unknown to Lucifer, his coming punishment will be dire!

The war did not take very long, by evening, Lucifer and his nearly 50 billion rebellious angels were defeated and were banished from heaven. Around 10 billion angels that were sitting on the fence waiting to join the wining team were also banished with Lucifer to hell!

The members of the wining team where rewarded with the beatific vision! They saw God and glorified him singing Holy, Holy, Holy Lord God Almighty!

None of the banished angels and the whole angels in haven knew about the existence of hell. A great force simply pushed these fallen angels against their will into a lake of fire. As they fell, deafening cries and weeping were heard in heaven. Their glorious delicate and beautiful nature was transformed into something very ugly, something monstrous. No one can describe the new nature they took. But surprisingly, they remained like angels and had angelic intelligence.

Soon these fallen angels discovered they can be anywhere within creation without ever leaving hell! Many of them descended into the vast ocean to know if their inflamed bodies can cool, or to get solace, but to no avail.

Today, the billions of fallen angels have developed a new occupation for themselves!

They act as antagonists in humanity’s relationship with God. When God moves in one direction, the demons deceive humanity to move in another direction. The most fascinating tool used by the fallen angels is possession! They take over the will of the person, pervert it and use it to destroy the person for their own pleasure.

Science oriented humans dismiss the existence of the angels and demons. They simply submit that the idea of angels and demons as living beings are just imaginative fiction and cannot be substantiated. This particular mind set shows the hypocrisy of scientific thinking because science is limited to material aspects of reality and so when science makes definitive statements in an area it has no jurisdiction, it becomes hypocrisy!

Apart from this, there are numerous ideas about angels and demons in the various religions of the world. 

Some religions suggest that apart from angels, there are double beings that look like humans that serve as intermediaries between humans and angels and demons. Some have called these beings Jins. They live like humans in a sublime plane and humans cannot perceive them but the intimately perceive humans.

Stories like this make it impossible for people to really take much interest in angels and demons since there are many types of stories about them and so which one is the correct one?

The lack of acknowledgement of angels and demons serve the demons well since they have free reign in the world causing untold hardship for humans, especially they cause the mortal sin of apostasy in humans.

The most intensive area of interest as far as interference of demons is concerned is their ability to take up someone’s will.

A story is told about a teenage boy, Oliver with an avid interest in girls. He claimed that he would bed at least 10 girls before he goes to the College. But when he bedded a girl named McKenzie, his story changed. He noticed that he sleeps with McKenzie even at night in a dreamlike state. He hears Mackenzie talk to him as he goes around. If McKenzie wants to meet him, she will simply say something into the air, the boy will hear it wherever he is.

Both of them found the experience fascinating! They even enjoyed it and thought that they have this supernatural connection! Some of their friends experimented with it and were also fascinated.

But things came to a head when McKenzie had a Motorcycle accident. She likes to ride big Motorcycles! She will speed through freeways back and forth in a day. On one of those rides, she had a seizure! McKenzie has never had any kind of seizure before and had no history of epilepsy. She was on top speed when it happened and she crashed with her motorcycle.

As paramedics approached seeing the debris from 2 miles away, they braced for the worst. It appeared as if the motorcycle was disintegrating before it finally crashed. On getting to McKenzie, they were flabbergasted to see that there was not a single wound on her body! So they checked her pulse to see that she is alive and no bones were broken. So, they drove her to the hospital. Doctors did all they could, but she remained in coma or so they thought. She was breathing and her heart beat was normal and yet no vital signed could be measured since the machines could not detect anything from her. When one touches her, her body was warm showing she was alive but hospital equipment picked nothing from her body.

The parents were contacted and they came full of tears to the hospital. Experts were called in but none of them knew what was going on. They checked and recheck her, nothing. The Hospital chaplain was called in to admonish the parents, to really give them the patience to wait and see what will eventually happen. But as the chaplain approached, McKenzie woke up and started to insult the priest and there was uproar in the Hospital! As paramedics tried to restrain her, smoke was coming out of her body and no one was able to hold her down. She simply had a formidable strength! After roundly insulting the priest, she fell down on the bed and slept off again!

So the insulted priest now knows that the event they were witnessing was a case of possession! They went to search the girl’s room at home but they found nothing unusual except that they saw the game called Ouija Board in her cupboard. The priest took it with the permission of the parents of the girl.

The girl sleep for two more days and the hospital was agog with activities all concerned about the fact that the girl was not eating, efforts to intubate her was not working! Her friend Oliver has been very restless and was not able to communicate with her as usual. So after waiting for some days to know if there will be news, he went to visit the girl at home. On reaching there, he met some of their friends exchanging banter outside. 

When they narrated what happened to him, he fainted! Paramedics were called in. They tried to resuscitate him to no avail so they took him to the same hospital where McKenzie was.  On reaching the hospital, he woke up! But he was not allowed to leave his bed, more tests are needed to know why he was not able to wake up at initial resuscitation. When the tests came back, it was revealed that he was having some problems in his brain, particularly the area of the brain responsible for cognition, parietal lobe. But the doctors have never seen this type of problem in this area of the brain. So they called for further studies.

While they were at it, McKenzie woke up and walked straight to Oliver’s room and they started to discuss hysterically! People were amazed! How did McKenzie know that Oliver was in the hospital? Mystery! While they talked the priest chaplain entered the ward with two other priests! As soon as Oliver and Mackenzie saw the priests, they became violent! They started to fight the priests physically, throwing objects at them. Security personnel were called in but the priests were beaten thoroughly, glasses were broken, equipments were damaged. As security arrived, they could not hold the boy and the girl down. One of the priests, bleeding all over managed to open his Holy Water can and tried to sprinkle but the entire cover broke and the entire content poured on McKenzie, she fell down in fits and was screaming! Oliver collapsed at that instant and was taken back to his bed. The entire hospital was turned upside down!

All of a sudden, McKenzie stopped quaking and sat there on the floor. She was held up by security operatives and she calmly followed them back to her room. On getting to her hospital room, she wanted to speak with the priests. The priests bleeding from various places removed themselves from the nurses who were tying to help them and rushed to McKenzie’s room. There McKenzie narrated a gory story to them! She calmly narrated what was going on, her voice rising and falling. The hospital recorded the narration. McKenzie was talking as if she was a demon! She said that her mission was to posses people through sex! Once you sleep with her, and she likes you really, she will connect with you and you will never leave her again.

She said that she can possess any one through gifts! If you accept gifts from her, you will be possessed by her. If you wear her cloths you will be possessed by her. One of the priests asked her: what is your name? She said, Mechona! The priest asked again, is that your real name! She said yes. The priest asked, who McKenzie is, she responded, she is here with me, in prison! At this point, the hospital chaplain produced the Ouija Board and the girl became agitated again. While they were still talking, news was brought that Oliver was dead! The girl burst out laughing hysterically, suggesting that she was happy that she has got the boy, forever!

She then said that it was McKenzie that invited her in her life through the Ouija Board. The demon said she is 100 billon years old.

At this point, the priests decided to tie the girl down and perform the exorcism rite on her! The girl cooperated with them but then right after they finished tying her up, the entire rope came off mysteriously and the girl ran out of the hospital at great speed, high-jacked a car nearby and fled!

The local news station was agog with fascinating story of these events! Since the girl fled, no one has seen her since!

This story reads like fiction. But this happened indeed.

 Possession is a daily activity. Many of the people you meet are possessed with one demon or the other! But since it is an immaterial encounter, we humans we cannot fully understand what is going on. We can only theorize that this is what is happening. Many still ardently deny the possibility of being possessed. But denial of mysterious events as a non events is hypocrisy!

Possessions happen and the demons responsible are those angels expelled from heaven! St. Michael the archangel still fights off these Demons! So call on him always to help is you.

Written by Malachy Igwilo,

11^th May, 2016 on the Feast day of Saints Philip and James.