Bishop Fellay of SSPX declares for Heresy!

Recently, the pseudo catholic organization, the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) help a meeting at which the removed its current head, Bishop Fellay! 

The elected officials shows how divided the organization is in terms of whether or not they should join the Novus Ordo/Vatican II religion now ruled by Mr. Jorg Bergolio aka Francis or not!

The new head of the SSPX is against joining Novus Ordo, at least for now!

But some days after the meeting, Bishop Fellay was selected as an adviser to the Superior General! Mind you all Fellay wants is to mix the organization with Novus Ordo! Now he will be advising the Superior General! This is very interesting!

Recently, the same Fellay gave an interview in which he denied that there are heresies in the Vatican II documents!

So Fellay is inching closer to coming out to accepting Vatican II fully but he is doing it in style using the modernist tactics of saying nothing in particular, directly!

A true Catholic, Bishop Donald Sanborn has responded to Fellay's acceptance of the heretical Vatican II. This response once again shows the full extent of the heresies of Vatican II which define Novus Ordo/Vatican II religion! 

Here are Bishop Sanborn's response:

Bishop Fellay, who has been, until recently, the head of the Society of Saint Pius X for the past twenty-four years, gave an interview to Tagespost in which he said a few things which deserve attention.

The first is this: “We have never said that the Council directly taught any heresies. But it took away the wall of protection from error, and thereby permitted error to show itself.”

Is this an accurate statement? Did Vatican II merely expose the Church to error? Or did it actually contain heresies? Answer: It contained heresies.

The first heresy of Vatican II: ecumenism. The document Unitatis Redintegratio, or the Decree on Ecumenism, contains a glaring heresy against the Catholic dogma which teaches that outside the Church there is no salvation. The Council states:

It follows that the separated Churches and Communities as such, though we believe them to be deficient in some respects, have been by no means deprived of significance and importance in the mystery of salvation. For the Spirit of Christ has not refrained from using them as means of salvation which derive their efficacy from the very fullness of grace and truth entrusted to the Church. [Unitatis Redintegratio, no. 3] [Emphasis added].

The Catholic Church teaches as dogma — it was called a “most well-known Catholic dogma” by Pius IX — that outside the Church there is no salvation. The Council states the precise contradictory of the Catholic dogma, namely that there is salvation outside the Catholic Church, that these non-Catholic religions can deliver salvation to their adherents, and are indeed the means by which they are saved. This is heresy.

The second heresy of Vatican II: religious liberty. The Catholic Church, professing to be the one, true Church founded by Jesus Christ, and outside of which there is no salvation, understands religious liberty to be the liberty of the Catholic Church to carry out its mission in the world, to establish itself everywhere, to function freely as an entity distinct from the State. It also claims the liberty of its adherents to profess and practice their Catholic faith without harassment or molestation.

It condemns the idea, as being contrary to Sacred Scripture, that all religions have these same liberties and these same rights. For to assert such a thing would be the same as saying that a person or organization would have a right to do something wrong. But this is contrary to the natural law, and therefore contrary to the Church’s teaching. You can have a right only to do something right, and never a right to do something wrong.

Liberty is the power of electing the good. License is the freedom falsely accorded to the will to elect evil. In order that there be the exercise of true liberty, it is necessary that it not detract from any duty. For liberty does not exist for evil, but for the good. Therefore, for as often as man abuses liberty for the purpose of committing evil, it should not be called liberty but instead license.

Liberty of conscience is absolutely impious. For man is by a most strict duty bound to think correctly about God, and concerning those things which regard both speculative and practical religion. But to go against a most strict duty of nature is license, not liberty. If we are talking about a voluntary transgression of our duty toward God, the aforesaid license is impiety. Because, therefore, through liberty of conscience the right is given to man to think concerning God however he pleases, this liberty, this right, is truly an impiety.

The liberty of religions, considered in itself, is absurd. This proposition is proven by what has been already said. For the liberty of religions is inferred only from the liberty of conscience. Because liberty of conscience is absurd, it follows also that the liberty of religions is absurd. But more must be said. If one concedes the liberty of religions, one takes away from God the power of imposing a determined worship upon men, and one imposes upon God a certain obligation of accepting or at least of approving any form of worship shown to Him by human reason. But God has commanded a form of worship — the Catholic religion. Consequently He is not obliged to accept just any form of worship that human beings give Him. It follows that men cannot, without obvious irreligion and impiety reject the precepts of God, and be the arbiters of their own worship. On the other hand, it is an impiety to deny to God the faculty of determining worship, and to impose some kind of duty upon Him of approving all forms of worship indiscriminately. Therefore the liberty of religions is absurd.

Vatican II, however, teaches that liberty of religion for the individual and for religious organizations is a right which flows from the notion of human dignity. Furthermore, it says that this teaching concerning human dignity is contained in revelation, but gives no reference where in revelation God guarantees the right to believe and practice whatever religion you want.

Vatican II teaches in Dignitatis Humanæ, no. 2:

This Vatican Council declares that the human person has a right to religious freedom. This freedom means that all men are to be immune from coercion on the part of individuals or of social groups and of any human power, in such wise that no one is to be forced to act in a manner contrary to his own beliefs, whether privately or publicly, whether alone or in association with others, within due limits.

Some try to defend the Council by saying that the only thing it means is that no one should be converted to Catholicism by the sword. The Church has always taught that conversion should not take place in such a manner, and has condemned any attempt to do so. That this is not the intention of the Council can be seen from the paragraphs subsequent to the one cited above:

The freedom or immunity from coercion in matters religious which is the endowment of persons as individuals is also to be recognized as their right when they act in community. Religious communities are a requirement of the social nature both of man and of religion itself.

Provided the just demands of public order are observed, religious communities rightfully claim freedom in order that they may govern themselves according to their own norms, honor the Supreme Being in public worship, assist their members in the practice of the religious life, strengthen them by instruction, and promote institutions in which they may join together for the purpose of ordering their own lives in accordance with their religious principles.

Religious communities also have the right not to be hindered, either by legal measures or by administrative action on the part of government, in the selection, training, appointment, and transfer-ral of their own ministers, in communicating with religious authorities and communities abroad, in erecting buildings for religious purposes, and in the acquisition and use of suitable funds or properties.
Religious communities also have the right not to be hindered in their public teaching and witness to their faith, whether by the spoken or by the written word.

Those of us who have lived in a country such as the United States, where the religious liberty described in these paragraphs is considered a normal, even sacred, civil right, fail to see the malice of these words. If we substitute “abortion” for “religion,” the point might become clearer: “This Vatican Council declares that the human person has a right to an abortion.” “Abortion clinics are a requirement of the social nature both of man and of abortion itself.” “Provided the just demands of public order are observed, abortion clinics rightfully claim freedom in order that they may govern themselves according to their own norms, publicly perform abortions, assist their members in the practice of abortion, strengthen them by instruction, and promote institutions in which they may join together for the purpose of ordering their own lives in accordance with their abortion principles.”

Need I go on? It should be pointed out here that, as heinous a crime as abortion is, the profession of a false religion is far more heinous in God’s sight, being directly contrary to His solemn rights. It is not to be forgotten that in Exodus (chapter 32) God ordered the slaying of all those who had participated in the worship of the golden calf, and who had not repented of it. The number of those slain was 23,000. This momentous event was to demonstrate to the Hebrew people the necessity of adhering to the true religion, and of shunning false religions. According to Vatican II, Moses should have proclaimed religious liberty for all of the calf-worshippers.

Religious liberty, as it is taught by Vatican II, is in-deed a heresy. It is solemnly condemned by Pope Pius IX as being against the Scriptures. Furthermore, Archbishop Lefebvre considered religious liberty to be a heresy. He said exactly this to Fr. Cekada in a dinner conversation at Oyster Bay.

The third heresy of Vatican II: The new ecclesiology. By ecclesiology we mean the Church’s doctrine concerning its own nature, that is, its essence and characteristics. Vatican II teaches a heretical ecclesiology. It is contained in Lumen Gentium.

The traditional dogma of the Catholic Church is that the Catholic Church, and it alone, is the one true Church of Christ, and that therefore any entity outside of itself is a false religion. This includes even those schismatic religions of the East which may have a valid priesthood and valid sacraments. If you are cut off from the center — the pope — you are nothing but a dead branch that has fallen off the vine.

Vatican II altered this doctrine in order to include other Christian denominations in the Church of Christ, saying that the Church of Christ, as an organized body, subsists in the Catholic Church.

What does it mean to subsist in? Subsistence is a perfection of a thing whereby it exists on its own, and not in something else. For example, a color cannot exist on its own, but must always exist in something else, e.g., paint, a flower, a cloth. That “something else” must have its own subsistence.

Applying this to ecclesiology, if the Church of Christ does not subsist on its own, but must subsist in something else, it means that the Church of Christ is really distinct from what it subsists in, namely that they are by nature two different things. It means that the Church of Christ is not the Catholic Church, and the Catholic Church is not the Church of Christ. If they were by nature not two different things, then they would be the same thing, and it would be necessary to say the the Church of Christ is the Catholic Church, which is precisely the dogma of the Catholic Church.

The “subsists in” doctrine also means that the Church of Christ could subsist in something else, like the Lutheran Church, for example.

While this doctrine does wonders for the heresy of ecumenism and religious liberty, it destroys the Church’s teaching that the Catholic Church is exclusively the Church of Christ, and vice versa. The Church of Christ and the Catholic Church are one and the same, and exclusively so, meaning that no other “Christian” organization can call itself the Church of Christ in any way whatsoever. The only appropriate name for them is a heretical or schismatic sect.

The fourth heresy of Vatican II: Collegiality. This doctrine, also contained in Lumen Gentium, holds that the subject (possessor) of supreme power in the Church is the college of bishops. Listen to the Council:

The order of bishops, which succeeds to the college of apostles and gives this apostolic body continued existence, is also the subject of supreme and full power over the universal Church, provided we understand this body together with its head the Roman Pontiff and never without this head.

This is heresy. For the Catholic Church teaches that the Roman Pontiff is the head of the Catholic Church. Listen to the Council of Florence: “We likewise define that the holy Apostolic See, and the Roman Pontiff, hold the primacy throughout the entire world, and that the Roman Pontiff himself is the successor of Blessed Peter, the chief of the Apostles, and the true Vicar of Christ, and that he is the head of the entire Church, and the father and teacher of all Christians; and that the full power was given to him in Blessed Peter by Our Lord Jesus Christ, to feed, rule, and govern the universal Church; just as is contained in the acts of the ecumenical councils and in the sacred canons.” (Decree for the Greeks, July 6, 1439)

Pope Pius VI condemned this doctrine: “All the bishops together and in one body govern the same Church, each one with full power.”

Some try to save Vatican II from heresy by saying that the Council states that the pope is the head of the college, and that it cannot act without him. But this does not save it from heresy, because the pope in that case simply becomes another member of the college of bishops, and merely a condition of their power, but not the source of their power.

Others try to save the Council by pointing out that the document asserts that the Pope is the head of the Church: “In virtue of his office, that is, as Vicar of Christ and pastor of the whole Church, the Roman Pontiff has full, supreme and universal power over the Church.”This is a futile attempt, however. No organization can have two heads, two supreme legislators. For example, it is impossible that both king and parliament be the supreme legislator. One must have the last word, to whom the other is subservient. King Charles I of England lost his head by upholding the supremacy of the king over parliament.

Yet others try to save the Council by citing the Preliminary Note of Explanation (the Nota Prævia), but this is worthless, since it is not part of the document accepted by the bishops. The modernist theologian Yves Congar was swift to point this out when he was a peritus at the Council. Besides, there is nothing in the Nota Prævia which cancels out the conciliarist heresy in the document.

The Catholic doctrine is that the pope, as supreme head of the Church, may invite the bishops into a general council, in which, by his consent, they participate in his power to rule the Church. Apart from these general councils, the authority of bishops is confined to their dioceses. The power to rule the diocese is from Christ, but comes to them through the Roman Pontiff, who may remove the power from them whenever he will. Pope Pius XII taught in the Encyclical Mystici Corporis: “Yet in exercising this office they [the bishops] are not altogether independent, but are subordinate to the lawful authority of the Roman Pontiff, although enjoying the ordinary power of jurisdiction which they receive directly from the same Supreme Pontiff.” (no. 42)

Bishop Fellay sells out to the Modernists on the Council. About a year ago, the Vatican told the Society of Saint Pius X that there could be no hope of reconciliation unless the SSPX accepts Vatican II and the post-Vatican II magisterium. By saying that there is no heresy in Vatican II, Bishop Fellay is saying that Vatican II is orthodox, that is, Catholic, and is not offensive to the Catholic Faith.

If that be so, then what have we been doing for the past fifty years?

Bishop Fellay also sells out on the question of the New Mass. Bishop Fellay makes this remark-able statement: “Not every New Mass is a scandal directly, but the repeated celebration of the New Mass leads to a weakening or even a loss of faith.”

Question: how could it not be a scandal if it leads to a loss of faith? How could an infallible and indefectible Church, the Church of Christ, assisted by the Holy Ghost, the pillar and ground of truth, as St.Paul calls it, promulgate to the whole world a rite which leads to the loss of faith? Bishop Fellay’s statement falls under the anathema of the Council of Trent: “If anyone says that the ceremonies, vestments, and outward signs, which the Catholic Church uses in the celebration of Masses, are incentives to impiety rather than the services of piety, let him be anathema.”

Bishop Fellay states in this same interview that the traditional Mass is like a silver trumpet, whereas the New Mass is like a brass trumpet:

I say only that if you are receiving a head of State, and you have the choice between a silver trumpet and a brass trumpet, would you choose the brass trumpet? It would be an insult. You would not do it. Even the best New Masses are like trumpets of brass, in comparison to the traditional liturgy. For God, we would choose what is better.

The only conclusion to draw from this statement is that the New Mass is a Catholic Mass but it is merely inferior to the traditional Mass. After all, they are both trumpets! The silver one is merely nicer than the brass one. I think a better analogy would have been to compare the New Mass not to a brass trumpet, but to a giant elephant passing gas.

Bishop Fellay, until recently, was the head of the organization which purports to be the bulwark of tradition, the single hope of the Catholic faithful who want to be protected from Vatican II and its reforms. Yet he is all mixed up in regard to the highest guiding principles of resistance to Vatican II. On the one hand he says that the New Mass weakens or destroys your faith — which means that it is poison — and then a few lines later says that it is a brass trumpet and not a silver one, indicating that there is merely a difference of quality between the two Masses.

It is for this reason that we rejoice over our separation from the SSPX in 1983. We saw the seeds of this utter theological confusion, this theology à la Maxine Waters, and wanted no part of it.

We may be small in comparison to the SSPX, but we are not mixed up. As Garrigou-Lagrange put it: “A thousand idiots do not equal one genius.” Likewise a thousand mixed up priests do not equal one priest with his head screwed on right.

Presented by Malachy Igwilo, 23 July 2018, feast of St. Appolonarius 

The Return of the Catholic Church to Nigeria!

There is a huge religion calling itself the Catholic Church but which is a totally false religion ruled by the devil through various agents!

The Chief agent of the devil currently ruling this huge religion is Mr. Jorg Bergoglio who tells the world that he is “Pope Francis”! This man is truly of the devil just like his five false predecessors namely John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI!

These men have been ruling this huge false religion since 1958 when this criminal religion was finally established and superimposed on Catholic structures!

In Nigeria, this evil religion has created 44 odd dioceses ruled by various false Bishops, with thousands of invalid priests, with Awka Dioceses in South Eastern Nigeria producing the highest invalid priests!

This gigantic false religion is mainly well established in Southern Nigeria with few struggling diocesan outposts in Northern Part of the country, constantly under threat by the Muslims! The work of these dioceses is to keep as many people in darkness as possible! They all swear allegiance to the man calling himself “pope Francis”!

We pray that those millions of Nigerians trapped in this huge false religion, the counterfeit Catholic Church, will flee from this evil much like someone flees from a burning building!

A brief History of the Catholic Church in Nigeria

The Catholic Church came to Nigeria in the 19^th century. It is believed that the first priest in Nigeria was the Irish Fr. Lutz, who arrived and started the mission immediately in 1885. A few Catholic priests came to this massive land during the European exploration of Africa.

They initial settlements were in Calabar, then Onitsha, Owerri, Umuahia and then Lagos and further inland. These priest-missionaries came to a VERY difficult terrain and hundreds of them died in the mosquito infested virgin forests of Southern Nigeria. But they did not stop due to the necessity to bring the true Gospel to Nigeria.

While they were at it, the false religionists like the Anglicans, Lutherans, Calvinists were also making forays. But the Catholic Church took the upper hand as people began to see that the Catholic Church was the true thing and those who joined or remains in the Anglican Church for instance, when the truth of the Catholic Church became known, were mainly unreasonable rebels who sought mere difference and cheap assess to the “white mans” goods!

The Catholic missionaries suffered all sorts of dangers and ostracism. But as the colonial project took hold, they were able to do their work unmolested from the pagans who sought ways of eliminating them. The concept of “evil forests” were forbidden places where, according to prevailing superstitions, evils spirits will easily eat up anyone who dare to enter it. Those who died without burials, having been banished into the “evils forests were believed to be roaming these places seeking merciless revenge on anyone daring to enter.

It is these “evil forests” that were given freely to the white missionaries for them to enter and die, naturally as expected. But these men, protected by God and zealous for the task at hand cleared these forests and made great mission centers out of this. The fact that the missionaries did not die as expected made many people to abandon paganism and joined the Church. So many were baptized and the Church was firmly established.

However, given the political turmoil of colonialism, real catechesis did not take place. Not enough people, in particular the lay men were able to know the faith inside out. Indeed there was no enough critical mass firmly established in the people to solidify and entrench the faith.

The faith started to take roots in the late 1950s when natives were ordained priests! These priests started to evangelize the people in the language they could understand! A generation of people knew the faith well enough to evangelize the whole country.

But sadly, the turmoil of independence struggle and the eventual civil war stunted the growth of the faith in Nigeria!

As the Biafran war of secession came in 1967, too many Easterners, the usual Catholics, left their places throughout Nigeria to run back to the South East for safety after they were methodically slaughtered by the Hausa-Fulani Muslim over lords! The killings were so massive and shocking that they can best be described as ethnic cleansing, a concept that did not exist at that time. So those who perpetrated these killings of millions of people are left unmolested to this day. Many of them remain alive and pilot the Nigerian political scene. These killings are unprecedented to the extent that the only real preoccupation for the Southerners is survival NOT the faith!

Although the native priests remained to take care of the faithful, they took care of mostly their material wellbeing through the help of Catholic Relief Organization, CARITAS! Caritas made use of local clergy to distribute relief to the hinterlands where people were hiding in the lurch green forests of Southern Nigeria. It was when the criminal Nigerian government blockaded the Seas in the South that CARITAS’ operations winded down leading eventually to the end of the war.

CARITAS made effort through air drops to continue its relief operations despite the blockade, by the British, Russian and American governments aided the murderous Nigerian government making it impossible for the reliefs to continue and eventually the war ended in 1970.

It was this war that distracted people from the evil Council, Vatican II which was held in 1962 to 1965. This council was the intellectual tour de force of the new false religion which usurped Catholic parishes and dioceses in Nigeria.

The Vatican II Council and Nigeria

Nigeria was largely a sparsely populated massive land by the time the Novus Ordo/Vatican II religion was established upon the structures of the Catholic Church! Many people were not aware of the massive takeover of the Catholic structures by Masonic forces. Many native priests were busy trying to evangelize the people. Unknown to them the Church has been hijacked by the dark forces of the Devil!

While the priests were yet trying to understand the Vatican II council and the takeover, a terrible war broke out leaving no time for doctrinal discernment. Too many died including those that knew the faith. By the time the war ended in 1970, the roots of the new religion has been planted in Nigeria through “papal nuncios” and agents of the false Vatican!

So the native priests went into apostasy like the rest of their colleagues worldwide! They did not resist the apostasy! They simply joined the false new religion with fear and trembling most of them lacking the training to know the full effects of this new religion! So Catholicism in Nigeria gradually faded!

When the new false Mass of Novus Ordo religion started, many people continued to celebrate the true Mass, the Tridentine Mass until their Bishops, usually white men, went to Europe to learn fully how to implement the devilish religion! So Catholicism ended in Nigeria, sadly!

The return of the Catholic Church!

The Catholic Church has returned to Nigeria! God works in mysterious ways! He sent out a single seminarian, called Bede Nkamuke, a young Engineer to travel to the Most Holy Trinity Seminary to be trained for the Catholic priesthood under the firm hands of Bishop Donald Sanborn!

While this young engineer was undergoing training in the seminary, a Novus Ordo conservative group called Society of Saint Pius the Tenth (SSPX) occupied Nigeria deceiving many people that their coming is the return of the true faith! They came with the true Mass and color! They came and entrenched themselves at Enugu, in Eastern Nigeria and many believed them to be Catholic!

But as time went by, thanks to the information explosion called the internet, many people saw the SSPX for what they are truly, a band of deceivers linked to the false religion of Novus Ordo! Many people abandoned them and waited on God to return the Church urgently to Nigeria!

As God wants it, the young Engineer, was ordained a priest in USA on 6^th November 2013, after an astounding training at a true Catholic Seminary, Most Holy Trinity Seminary, Brookeville Florida, USA!

Not long after his ordination, he returned to Nigeria as the first missionary priest here to return Nigeria to Catholicism!

He is making astounding success after decades of the Novus Ordo assault on the souls of Nigerians! Today, about 200 people are part of this true Catholic Church which has returned to Nigeria and these are scattered in the various towns in Southern Nigeria mostly in Lagos, Port Harcourt, Owerri, Agenebode, Onitsha, Umunze, and Enugu!

A few persons have converted in Abuja, the capital of Nigeria but there is just this ONE priests taking care of these many missions! This is even a preparatory seminary in Nigeria now under the tutelage of Fr. Bede Nkamuke, made up of 5 seminarians who get preliminary training here in Nigeria before going to the Most Holy Trinity Seminary in Florida, USA to be trained under the watchful eyes of a true catholic Bishop, Bishop Donald Sanborn. One of these seminarians is a from Ghana! Perhaps from Nigeria, the Catholic Church will return as well to Ghana! It will be a glorious day!

There is video posted above which you need to see, posted with this piece, for you to see the extent this priest-engineer is going in Nigeria!

We pray that the true faith will continue to spread throughout Nigeria. Amen.

If you are in Nigeria and wish to learn about the new faith call this number: 07038611282.

Presented by Malachy Igwilo, 22 July 2018, Feast of Mary Magdalene

The Naked “Pope” Francis!

It is just a metaphor to say that Mr. Jorg Bergoglio is naked! Yes, he is naked in public! We have seen him clearly as an apostate, a dictator and a supporter of pedophilia! 

He even beatified a pedophilia despite evidences! He has asked those who call themselves Catholics to seek the intercession of a pedophilia!

How many evils of Francis can we count before we can convince people that this pretender is a non-Catholic apostate! Truth be told, the sins do not make him a non-Catholic! What make him a non-Catholic are his heresies and apostasies which he proclaims nearly everyday!

Yet, people in their right senses call him “Holy Father”, “Pope”, “Vicar of Christ’….what insult tour Lord!

You may recall that Francis the dictator wanted to silence one of his invalid bishops in Chile! Apparently, the man tried to cover up a pedophilia with the support of Francis but when the new broke, Francis wanted to save him own face and punish the poor fellow whom he forced to resign!

As Francis visited Chile where he continued to deceive people that he is “pope”, a journalist asked him, in public about this cover up! He became visibly angry! The face of Francis, red with anger went round the world! Francis then said that the blame is on the Chilean “Bishops’’! This prompted the entire Chilean 34 “Bishops” to resign! They all decided to go since, according to Francis, they are hiding pedophilia!

What a game! I just love this drama! It shows us the rotten meat that is Novus Ordo/Vatican II religion where millions are perishing!

The latest is that a woman has accused Francis again, in a spectacular way that he DIRECTLY tried for cover up a “priest” who sexually abused his son!

The import of this story is that since Francis asked those who has been accused of pedophilia to resign, he himself should take a lead and resign from pretending to be “pope’!  He should take the lead!

Here is the latest Story as was written by Tradition in Action who, by the way, sees Mr. Bergoglio as pope! So this article although calls Francis “pope”, we all know that a non-Catholic like Mr. Bergoglio cannot be pope in the Catholic Church!

“On May 26, 2018, journalist Marco Tosatti from La Stampa in Turin, Italy, posted an article on his website Stilum Curiaereporting the involvement of Pope Francis in a cover-up for a pedophile priest in Buenos Aires when he was Archbishop of that city. The article refreshed some little-known old data reported by the Spanish blog Publico. Soon after, however, Tossatti's article was removed from that site, probably due to pressure from the Vatican.

Nonetheless, his full article had been transcribed by another Italian website – Acta Apostolicae Sedis.

The case history & cover-up

In May 2013, the Appeals Tribunal of Quilmes, Buenos Aires, Argentina, confirmed a sentence by the City Court condemning the Diocese to pay US $27,000 (115,600 pesetas) to a victim of pedophilia to compensate for his psychological treatment and the moral damage he suffered.

Soon after in that same May 2013, the Spanish blog Publico highlighted the the case of a 15-year-old Argentinian – Gabriel Ferrini – who had been abused by Fr. Ruben Pardo in 2002. Immediately after being sexually violated, the youth reported the crime to his mother, Beatriz. She went to the Bishop of Quilmes, Luis Teodorico Stöckler.

The Diocese of Quilmes is subordinate to the Province of Buenos Aires whose Archbishop at that time was none other than Jorge Bergoglio. Bishop Stöckler called the priest to confront him with the accusation. Pardo acknowledged the abuse before the Bishop 96 hours after the abuse took place.

Since the Bishop delayed in punishing the priest, Beatriz Varela tried to communicate with Archbishop Jorge Bergoglio. However, he refused to receive her and ordered his bodyguards to prevent her from entering his residence. Symptomatically, at the same time the Archbishop of Buenos Aires was hosting the pedophile priest in a comfortable residence under his jurisdiction.

The abuse took place on August 15, 2002. Beatriz Varela was a worker in a diocesan school of Quilmes. She had asked the vicar of the local parish, Fr. Ruben Pardo, to instruct her two sons in the truths of the Catholic Church. The priest went to her house and, after giving some classes there, told Beatriz that he would continue the instruction in the church providing that Gabriel spend the night there. He also told the mother that in this way the youth could serve his early morning Mass. 

With his mother’s consent, the youth went to the rectory for the class. That evening, Pardo invited Gabriel to sleep with him in his bed. The youth first interpreted the gesture as a paternal invitation, until the moment when the priest actually violated him sexually. Gabriel reported: “I knew he was violating me but I couldn’t think of how to avoid it, because I was in shock and very afraid.”

When the priest ended the abuse and fell asleep, Gabriel slipped out and ran back to his house and reported what had happened to his mother. Beatriz went straight to Bishop Luis Stöcker. She stated: “Initially, he showed consternation, but, as the time went by, he did not take any action.” Instead, she continued, the Bishop “tried to minimize the case, saying that I had to be merciful with persons who chose celibacy as a vocation because they have moments of weakness.”

Beatriz told the Bishop that she wanted “truth, justice and the guarantee that such a thing would not happen to anyone else.” The Bishop then threatened to cut her employment. “I worked for a school in the Diocese,” she said, explaining her difficult situation.

Next, Beatriz had recourse to the Church Tribunal, whose president “refused to accept the denunciation.” Fifteen days later, she was interviewed by four priests “who submitted me to a humiliating interrogation with lascivious and tendentious questions, as if I were the one who had induced the abuse, when they knew for sure that the abuser had admitted the fact 96 hours after the episode before the Bishop, who reprimanded him.”

The mother of the victim also went to the Archdiocese, the residence of Archbishop Jorge Bergoglio. He refused to receive her and sent his security guards to expel her from the property. Soon afterwards, she learned that Fr. Ruben Pardo was a guest at the Vicar’s House in the Flores neighborhood, directly dependent on the Archbishop of Buenos Aires. She observed: “Bergoglio was aware of this situation because no one can be installed in the Vicar’s House without the authorization of the Archbishop.”

She boldly accused Pope Francis: “This is Bergoglio’s compromise: He speaks against cases of pedophilia in the Church, but uses hypocrisy, lies and complicity to cover them. He does not care about God and society.”

Then, she made a more general censure: “In the Church everyone knows and everyone keeps silent; thus, all are accomplices.”

She also mentioned other cases she knew about: “There were priests who were transferred to the Archdiocese of Cordoba after I made the denunciation. Last Friday a desolate mother called me because her 4-year-old daughter had been violated by those two priests, who still work in the school. … Other children are still at risk.” The mother of the abused girl did not want to go to press, but she did start a lawsuit against the priests.

Regarding the final verdict of the Appeals Tribunal and the Court of Quilmes, she also had bitter memories: “When the priest who abused my son died [of AIDS in 2005], the process disappeared for two years. When the lawsuit fell into the risk of expiring [by the statute of limitations], my son tried to commit suicide. He had to be interned for one-and-a-half months in a psychiatric clinic. No amount of money can compensate for what we have suffered.”

The son, Gabriel Ferrini, also had an opinion on the sentence: “The verdict established a judicial precedent and can help other victims so that it will not be so difficult for them to find a solution.

“It is necessary to take action because many people are afraid or too ashamed to denounce and quarrel with someone in clerical garb.”

This is the case that came to light at the end of May, when Marco Tossati highlighted the sentence by the Appeals Tribunal of Quilmes declaring the Diocese of Quilmes guilty of pedophile abuse.

This case resurfaced at the very moment when Pope Bergoglio was being besieged by public indignation over his nomination of and cover-up for Bishop Barros in the Diocese of Osorno, Chile. So, following his old pattern of action, Bergoglio apparently sent his “security guards” to threaten the Italian journalist who was trying to make these data public.

Years ago in Buenos Aires he used the same strong arm system against Beatriz Varela; now in Rome he seems to be using an identical procedure with Marco Tossati. Let me help to expose this plot, if it exists. I do not like “security guards” used for this purpose. They remind me of the methods of All Capone. Further, I believe it is time for us Catholics to become aware of what the “honest, pure, merciful and humble” procedures of our Holy Father really are”. 

We see that we have before us a Devil’s science and yet people say he is “pope”! Wait until a Muslim becomes pope as well! People will do nothing! They will cook things up to justify it as they are justifying Francis now! God help us all. Amen.

Presented by Malachy Igwilo, 3 July 2018, feast of St. Leo.

Imitation of “Saints” in Novus Ordo/Vatican II religion!

As is now public knowledge, Mr. Jorg Bergoglio, aka Francis will “canonize” the homosexual Anti-pope, Paul VI soon!

Making a statement about this “canonization”, Francis joked that he and Benedict XVI are next in line for “canonization” as far as “canonizing” Vatican II anti-popes are concerned!

This joke says a lot about why Novus Ordo is “canonizing” or “Beatifying” all the Novus Ordo anti-popes with their non-Catholic canonization process! So this impeding “canonization” comes as no surprise since the Second founder of new religion masquerading as Catholicism needs to be promoted to sainthood to boast the legitimacy of the apostate religion. It seems that it is Benedict XVI and Francis that will “canonize” ALL the anti-popes of Novus Ordo and after Francis “canonizes” Benedict XVI, another anti-pope will “canonize” Francis! Who knows? We simply sit and keep watching the trajectories of this false religion!

In canonizing the founders of the Novus Ordo/Vatican II religion, Benedict XVI and Francis enforce the supposed holiness of their founding work.

We see the real Catholic Church doing the same thing by canonizing the founders of the great orders in the Church such as Sts. Francis, Dominic, Ignatius, and Alphonsus Liguori. Joining orders founded by great saints are naturally encouraged because their orders are their holy works.

The point is that we want to imitate the lives of saints, as recommended by the Church, for the reasons they were made saints.

The Franciscans, for example, embody the spirit of the life of St. Francis. The same goes for the Dominicans, Jesuits, and Redemptorists. Can you name one saint before Pope Pius XII who did wicked things after his conversion which would call into question whether he should be a saint at all?

When we look at the lives of saints, we are given examples of how to live as Catholics. We may not be able to do the extraordinary things like fly around and fast for 40 days three times a year as St. Joseph Cupertino or bilocate like St. Mary Agreda, but we can and should imitate their works of mercy.

Now we come to the “saints” of the Vatican II popes. Several years ago before John Paul II was “canonized”, many objections were raised by even come members of Novus Ordo religion and those who are not really in Novus Ordo but are also not in the Catholic Church, the so-called semi-traditionalists! But ALL the objections were ignored studiously and the call of “santo sobito” was realized in John Paul II, Novus Ordo style! 

Think about this. “SAINT” John Paul II practiced Zoroastrianism with a Priestess of that religion in 1986. 

He invited the world’s pagan leaders to pray to their false gods for world peace TWICE at Assisi in 1986 and 2002.  

He approved altar girls by law and said they “enrich the liturgy.” 

He stated in 2000, “May St. John the Baptist protect Islam.” 

In 1989, he denied the dogma on the literal descent of Christ into hell teaching that this phrase in the creed was metaphorical for death, the separation of body and soul. 

Read what “Saint” John Paul II told an imam of Islam on February 24 2000:  

“Grand Sheikh, Islam is a religion. Christianity is a religion. Islam has become a culture. Christianity has become also a culture… I thank your university, the biggest center of Islamic culture. I thank those who are developing Islamic culture…” (L’Osservatore Romano, March 1, 2000, p. 5.)

This is a culture that blasphemes the Most Holy Trinity while misleading literally a billion people away from the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Great!

Keeping in mind the imitation of the lives of saints, does this mean it should be okay and praiseworthy to worship in false temples, with false religions, love altar girls, pray that Islam be protected, and deny dogmas since a “saint” and “pope” did so until he died?

Now there’s going to be a “SAINT” Paul VI, who publicly wore the Jewish Ephod* in place of the Pectorial Cross thereby affirming the priesthood of Judaism, denied a dozen dogmas by signing Vatican II documents, invented sacraments, and he even placed his papal ring on the Anglican archbishop and invited him to bless the faithful in St. Peter’s Square.

We truly have to wonder what a person would have to do short of murder, adultery, and grand theft not to be qualified for sainthood in the Vatican 2 religion.

Since canonization is an infallible act by the pope who is not bound by any law to do so, how can one reconcile the “canonizations” of the Vatican II anti-popes with the Catholic Faith?

How can a Catholic in good faith recognize as saints men whose works were abominable, and if imitated, would be mortally sinful?

Ofcourse such is impossible! But then millions of people trapped inside Novus Ordo will dismiss the evils of these non-saints and continued to refer to them as “saints”! That is the way it is! You need to be blind to remain in Novus Ordo/Vatican II religion!

Presented by Malachy Igwilo, 15^th of June 2018, Feast of St. Vitus and St. Modestus

*Footnote:

“Now then, the breastpiece was a prominent Jewish emblem. It symbolically represented the twelve tribes of carnal Israel at the ritual celebrations. Nothing, then, justifies the wearing of this ritual object by a Pope, its visible head of the new people of God, the children of the New Covenant. Even the fact that no previous Pope during the 2,000-year history of the Church has ever worn this ritualistic object of religious Judaism, seems to demonstrate that there is an absolute incompatibility between the profession of our Catholic Faith and the wearing of the ephod or “breastplate of judgment,” thoroughly described in the Exodus as characteristic and exclusive of the Levitical high priest.

Since Paul VI wore it publicly, we have the right, and moreover, a grave obligation of conscience to investigate why…John Baptist Montini wears the breastpiece because in his heart, rather than a Pope, he is a Levitical high priest. Consciously or unconsciously, only God knows, he seems to be associated with international Judaism, its mighty leaders, and its destructive tools of Communism and Masonry. On the other hand, in his genealogical line of ancestors we find actual roots of Jewish origin, just as in the cases of other cardinals, monsignors, and theologians who have masterminded this dreadful revolution in God’s Church.” 

(Fr. Joaquin Saenz Y Arriaga, S.J. PHD., The New Montinian Church, 1971 A.D. pp. 302-303),

View at: 

https://archive.org/details/TheNewMontinianChurchSaenzYArriagaRev.Joaquin4129.o