On his trip back from
Panama from the so-called “World’s Youth’s Day”, what many have lampooned “the
Catholic Woodstock, Francis once again promoted the evil of teaching children
sex education! This evil entity called Francis already wrote in his abominable
tome, Amoris Laetitia, that sex education is a must for children!
Ofcourse this
particular evil did not garner condemnation even from the Dubia “cardinals” who
fixated themselves on Francis’ promotion of “communion” for divorced and
remarried. They missed his promotion of sex education, his idea that women can
be “priests” one day, his banishment of the idea that some people are living in
sin, and countless other evils in Amoris. They missed it all!
Once again, as he left
the “Catholic Woodstock” he would like people to learn about sex early in life!
Remember that Woodstock had to do with sex, drugs and rock music and which
became popular in the 1980s as a place for young people to gather and commit
all the evils against chastity.
Now the World’s Youth
Day mimics this Woodstock with one difference, the Novus Ordo abominable sacrifice
is offered there and people feel they are in prayer mood while in actual fact,
all the evils against chastity are committed and much more!
It is as if Francis
wants the youths to learn about sex and do it better having seen them in action
at the event in Panama!
There is nothing
Catholic in anything Francis is doing and his religion which is occupying the
Vatican and Catholic parishes worldwide is not the Catholic Church. That much
is obvious, unless those whose heads are buried in the sand!
But his fixation about
sex education is another sign that he is not catholic by any shred and those
that follow him are not Catholics either!
Francis' pronouncement in Amoris Laetitia on
“The Need for Sex Education,” appeared in Chapter Seven, titled “Towards a Better
Education of Children,” (See pgs 280-286)
The main heading, “The Need for Sex Education,” is instructive in light of the fact that prior
to the invention of Novus Ordo religion, no such instruction was deemed necessary
by Holy Mother Church apart from the
natural instruction given by parents to their children on sexual matters as
they enter womanhood and manhood.
More than that, classroom "sex education" for children and youth was
expressly prohibited by Pope Pius XI in his encyclical on Christian
education Divini Illius Magistri issued on December 31, 1929, where
we find the Catholic Church's first official prohibition of formal sex
instruction in an open classroom setting, an academic novelty which was
introduced into certain liberal Catholic educational circles in the early part
of the 20th century.
Pope Pius XI states:
“Another very grave danger is that naturalism which
nowadays invades the field of education in that most delicate matter of purity
of morals. Far too common is the error of those who with dangerous assurance
and under an ugly term propagate a so-called sex-education, falsely imagining
they can forearm youths against the dangers of sensuality by means purely
natural, as a foolhardy initiation and precautionary instruction for all
indiscriminately, even in public; and, worse still, by exposing them at an
early age to the occasions, in order to accustom them, so it is argued, and as
it were to harden them against such danger.
Such persons grievously err in refusing to recognize the inborn weakness of
human nature, and the law of which the Apostle speaks, fighting against the law
of the mind and also in ignoring the experience of facts, from which it is
clear that, particularly in young people, evil practices are the effect not so
much of ignorance of intellect as of weakness of a will exposed to dangerous
occasions, and unsupported by the means of grace. ... Speaking generally,
during the period of childhood it suffices to employ those remedies which
produce the double effect of opening the door to the virtue of purity and closing
the door upon vice”
Please read this great pope again to see how far
removed Francis is from him! They are not of the same religion, surely!
Divini Illius Magistri, especially Pius XI's
citation of the insights of 16th century Roman writer, Silvio Cardinal
Antoniano, on the Christian education of children, upholds the principle that
the responsibility of transmitting intimate information on sexual matters to
youth belongs primarily to parents who have both the grace of state and
intimate knowledge of their offspring.
Not unexpectedly, the evil men of Novus Ordo and their Freemasonic benefactors
of our day cannot be admonished by Pius XI's explicit opposition to open sex
instruction for Catholic schoolchildren.
So two years later, on March 21, 1931, the Holy
Office was forced to publicly restate the prohibition in a question fomat:
Question: May the method called “sex education” or
even “sex initiation” be approved?
Answer; NO –
The Holy Office refers back to Divini Illius
Magistri adding: “No approbation
whatever can be given to the advocacy of the new method, even as taken up
recently by some Catholic authors and set before the public in printed
publications.”
The year 1929 in which Divini Illius was
written, was very significant. The turn of the 20th century brought with it a
rise in anti-life, anti-marriage and anti-family organizations represented by
the Eugenicists, the Neo-Malthusians, the Sangerites, the Darwinists, Social
Anarchists and an assortment of other "Sexual Reformers."
From September 8 to 14, 1929, members of the Congress of the World League of
Sexual Reform met in London to promote their agenda which included the
promotion of onanism, birth control, masturbation, eugenics, population
control, sterilization, artificial insemination, divorce, and feminism; the
decriminalization of homosexuality, abortion, pornography, and prostitution;
and most importantly, “sex hygiene” and “sex education” instruction for youth.
These programs were viewed by the “sex reformers” as the primary vehicle for
the implementation of their agenda.
Pius XI's dual thunderbolts – his encyclical on Christian education which
banned public sex instruction in schools, followed one year later by his famed encyclical
in defense of Christian marriage, Casti Connubii – showed again the position of
the Church on these matters.
Pope Pius XII upheld his predecessor's ban on sex initiation programs twice.
Once on September 18, 1951, in an address to the French Fathers of Families in
which he condemned the scourge of sex initiation programs which greatly
exaggerates the importance and range of the sexual element of life. And second,
on April 13, 1953, in an address to a Congress on Psychotherapy and Religion in
which he reminded his academic audience that “These rules [on sex instruction]
have not been rescinded, either expressly or via facti (emphasis
added).”
So, the placement of the subject of "sex education" in the Francis’
Amoris is also significant.
There can be no mistake that Francis perceives that
proper sexual instruction of children is to take part outside the home and is
connected principally to institutionalized sexual instruction in the classroom
apart from the parents and home life.
Thus we read,
The Second Vatican Council spoke of the need for
"a positive and prudent sex education" to be imparted to children and
adolescents "as they grow older," with "due weight being given
to the advances in the psychological, pedogogical and didactic sciences."
We may well ask ourselves if our educational institutions have taken up
this challenge (emphasis added).
There is no mystery about the diabolical origins of "sex education,"
as noted above.
According to Dr. Richard Day, a former National Medical Director of Planned
Parenthood-World Population, the real purpose of “sex education” is to get
children interested in sex at an early age and have them make the connection
between sex and the need for contraception early in their lives, even before
they become sexually active. In a 1969 speech on the coming “New World System
(Order)” Day insisted that sex must be separated from reproduction and
reproduction from sex.
Following the U.S. Supreme Court decision of January 22, 1973, Dr. Alan
Guttmacher,, another Planned Parenthood official, was asked by a reporter for
the Washington Star News how Roe vs. Wade could be made absolutely
secure, once and for all. Guttmacher responded with two words, “sex education.”.
The right to sex education dovetails into:
The "right" to contracept.
The "right" to sterilize oneself and the
retarded.
The "right" to commit adultery, and to
trial marriage and divorce.
The "right" to eugenic breeding, i.e.,
artificial insemination and surrogate motherhood.
The "right" to suicide and euthanasia,
i.e., to kill oneself and others who are ill.
The "right" to infanticide, i.e., to kill
mentally and physically handicapped babies.
The "right" to eugenic abortion, i.e., to
kill the handicapped unborn child.
The "right" to free access to pornography.
The "right" to all forms of sexual
expression including masturbation, sodomy, incest, bestiality, and
sadomasochism.
The "right" to pederasty and pedophilia so
that children and youth can engage in "creative" sexuality.
The "right" to commercial sex, i.e., male
and female prostitution, as well as heterosexual, homosexual, transgender and
surrogate sex therapy and reconstructive surgery.
The "right" of the State to implement
programs of population control, both voluntary and compulsory.
We must therefore note that “Sex Education” promoted
by the soul killer Francis is not about God or the Natural Law. It is about
sexual idolatry.
It is not about virtue. It's about vice.
It is not about morality. It's about immorality.
It is not about chastity and modesty. It's about the
cannibalism of innocence and purity.
It is not about the facts if life, but rather about
death and killing.
It is not about fecundity. It's about sterility.
It is not about love. It's about achieving genital
stimulation and release.
It is not about respect and honor. It's about
dishonor and infidelity.
It is not about family life, but about the
destruction of the family and the undermining of parental authority.
In short, "sex education" is anti-educational,
anti-child and anti-family. It is a form of sexual conditioning and
"reconstructive psychotherapy" designed to deform youthful
consciences and turn young people into sexual robots and polymorphous perverts.
It is a legalized form of child seduction and molestation.
Is it any wonder that the Novus Ordo anti popes and the majority of American Novus Ordo invalid bishops have demonstrated such a callus lack of concern for victims of clerical
sexual abuse?
Why should Catholic parents be surprised? The American Novus Ordo invalid bishops
have permitted hundreds of millions of Novus Ordo school children to be
mentally and spiritually raped under the guise of “family life instruction”, a
code name for sex education, for more than half a century.
After thirteen years of classroom sex instruction which destroys the latency
period of the young, arrests normal sexual development in adolescents, and
breaks down sexual inhibitions and feelings of revulsion for sexual perversions
including masturbation, homosexuality, and pornography to which children and
youth are systematically exposed, school children are so damaged, that barring
a miracle of grace, they cannot but find themselves unfit to lead a truly holy
Catholic life as adults, be they single, married or religious.
We should note that the Francis’ agenda is to damn souls! They use the Catholic
name, which they do not have rights to perpetrate evil. We need to speak out
against these evil men working with Francis worldwide as the assault the innocence
of children.
In the end, it is only through the discovery or rediscovery of the spiritual
life – a life filled with the love of Christ, a life of prayer and penance, a
life of purity and conformity to God's laws as taught by the true Catholic
Church that the world can return to sanity and sanctity in preparation for the
world to come.
As for Amoris Laetitia – BURN IT. As for Francis- IGNORE THE
CRIMINAL!
Presented by Malachy Igwilo, 4th February
2019. Feast of St. Andrew Corsini
