As is now public knowledge, Mr. Jorg Bergoglio, aka Francis
will “canonize” the homosexual Anti-pope, Paul VI soon!
Making a statement about this “canonization”,
Francis joked that he and Benedict XVI are next in line for “canonization” as
far as “canonizing” Vatican II anti-popes are concerned!
This joke says a lot about why Novus Ordo is
“canonizing” or “Beatifying” all the Novus Ordo anti-popes with their
non-Catholic canonization process! So this impeding “canonization” comes as no
surprise since the Second founder of new religion masquerading as Catholicism
needs to be promoted to sainthood to boast the legitimacy of the apostate
religion. It seems that it is Benedict XVI and Francis that will “canonize” ALL
the anti-popes of Novus Ordo and after Francis “canonizes” Benedict XVI,
another anti-pope will “canonize” Francis! Who knows? We simply sit and keep
watching the trajectories of this false religion!
In canonizing the founders of the Novus Ordo/Vatican
II religion, Benedict XVI and Francis enforce the supposed holiness of their
founding work.
We see the real Catholic Church doing the same thing
by canonizing the founders of the great orders in the Church such as Sts.
Francis, Dominic, Ignatius, and Alphonsus Liguori. Joining orders founded by
great saints are naturally encouraged because their orders are their holy
works.
The point is that we want to imitate the lives of
saints, as recommended by the Church, for the reasons they were made saints.
The Franciscans, for example, embody the spirit of
the life of St. Francis. The same goes for the Dominicans, Jesuits, and
Redemptorists. Can you name one saint before Pope Pius XII who did wicked
things after his conversion which would call into question whether he should be
a saint at all?
When we look at the lives of saints, we are given
examples of how to live as Catholics. We may not be able to do the
extraordinary things like fly around and fast for 40 days three times a year as
St. Joseph Cupertino or bilocate like St. Mary Agreda, but we can and should
imitate their works of mercy.
Now we come to the “saints” of the Vatican II popes.
Several years ago before John Paul II was “canonized”, many objections were
raised by even come members of Novus Ordo religion and those who are not really
in Novus Ordo but are also not in the Catholic Church, the so-called
semi-traditionalists! But ALL the objections were ignored studiously and the
call of “santo sobito” was realized in John Paul II, Novus Ordo style!
Think about this. “SAINT” John Paul II practiced
Zoroastrianism with a Priestess of that religion in 1986.
He invited the world’s
pagan leaders to pray to their false gods for world peace TWICE at Assisi in
1986 and 2002.
He approved altar girls by law and said they “enrich the
liturgy.”
He stated in 2000, “May St. John the Baptist protect Islam.”
In 1989,
he denied the dogma on the literal descent of Christ into hell teaching that
this phrase in the creed was metaphorical for death, the separation of body and
soul.
Read what “Saint” John Paul II told an imam of Islam on February 24 2000:
“Grand Sheikh, Islam is a religion. Christianity is
a religion. Islam has become a culture. Christianity has become also a culture…
I thank your university, the biggest center of Islamic culture. I thank those
who are developing Islamic culture…” (L’Osservatore Romano, March 1, 2000, p.
5.)
This is a culture that blasphemes the Most Holy
Trinity while misleading literally a billion people away from the Gospel of
Jesus Christ. Great!
Keeping in mind the imitation of the lives of
saints, does this mean it should be okay and praiseworthy to worship in false
temples, with false religions, love altar girls, pray that Islam be protected,
and deny dogmas since a “saint” and “pope” did so until he died?
Now there’s going to be a “SAINT” Paul VI, who
publicly wore the Jewish Ephod* in place of the Pectorial Cross thereby
affirming the priesthood of Judaism, denied a dozen dogmas by signing Vatican
II documents, invented sacraments, and he even placed his papal ring on the
Anglican archbishop and invited him to bless the faithful in St. Peter’s
Square.
We truly have to wonder what a person would have to
do short of murder, adultery, and grand theft not to be qualified for sainthood
in the Vatican 2 religion.
Since canonization is an infallible act by the pope
who is not bound by any law to do so, how can one reconcile the “canonizations”
of the Vatican II anti-popes with the Catholic Faith?
How can a Catholic in good faith recognize as saints
men whose works were abominable, and if imitated, would be mortally sinful?
Ofcourse such is impossible! But then millions of
people trapped inside Novus Ordo will dismiss the evils of these non-saints and
continued to refer to them as “saints”! That is the way it is! You need to be
blind to remain in Novus Ordo/Vatican II religion!
Presented
by Malachy Igwilo, 15th of June 2018, Feast of St. Vitus and St.
Modestus
*Footnote:
“Now then, the breastpiece was a prominent Jewish
emblem. It symbolically represented the twelve tribes of carnal Israel at the
ritual celebrations. Nothing, then, justifies the wearing of this ritual object
by a Pope, its visible head of the new people of God, the children of the New
Covenant. Even the fact that no previous Pope during the 2,000-year history of
the Church has ever worn this ritualistic object of religious Judaism, seems to
demonstrate that there is an absolute incompatibility between the profession of
our Catholic Faith and the wearing of the ephod or “breastplate of judgment,”
thoroughly described in the Exodus as characteristic and exclusive of the
Levitical high priest.
Since Paul VI wore it publicly, we have the right,
and moreover, a grave obligation of conscience to investigate why…John Baptist
Montini wears the breastpiece because in his heart, rather than a Pope, he is a
Levitical high priest. Consciously or unconsciously, only God knows, he
seems to be associated with international Judaism, its mighty leaders, and its
destructive tools of Communism and Masonry. On the other hand, in his
genealogical line of ancestors we find actual roots of Jewish origin, just as
in the cases of other cardinals, monsignors, and theologians who have
masterminded this dreadful revolution in God’s Church.”
(Fr. Joaquin Saenz Y
Arriaga, S.J. PHD., The New Montinian Church, 1971 A.D. pp. 302-303),
View at:
