St Peter's Basilica

St Peter's Basilica

Subscribe to EverythingCatholicBlog

Search This Blog

Tuesday, 31 May 2016

A Great Prayer to St. Patrick



Image result for st. patrick


This prayer should be said everyday by everyone! It is a highly efficacious prayer. A person who says this prayer daily was involved in a ghastly motor accident with his whole family. Several people died and the entire family of 6 survived.

NONE sustained even a scratch!

This is not to say that this prayer is a magic wand. But it is to say that when we say this prayer, we come under the patronage of St. Patrick and given the will of God, and striving always to be in a state of grace, we shall obtain God’s favors and protection.


So, say this prayer daily and give to your friends for their own protection.


The Breastplate of St. Patrick
I bind to myself this day
The strong virtue of the invocation of the Holy Trinity
The faith of the Trinity in unity
The creator of the elements
I bind to myself this day
The power of the incarnation of Christ and His Baptism
The power of his Crucifixion with his Burial,
The power of his Resurrection with His Ascension
The power of His coming to the sentence of the judgment
I bind to myself this day
The power of the love of the seraphim
In the obedience of the Angels
In the hope of Resurrection unto reward
In the prayer of the Patriarchs
In the prediction of the prophets
In the preaching of the apostles
In the faith of confessors
In the purity of virgins
In the deeds of holy men
I bind to myself this day
The power of God to guide me
The might of God to uphold me
The wisdom of God to teach me
The eye of God to watch over me
The Ear of God to hear me
The word of God to give me speech
The hand of God to protect me
The way of God to lie before me
The shield of God to shelter me
The host of God to defend me
Against the temptation of vices
Against the lust of nature
Against every man that meditates injury to me
Whether far or near
Whether alone or with many
I have invoked all these virtues
Against every hostile, savage power warring upon my body and my soul
Against the enchantment of false prophets
Against the black laws of heathenism
Against the false laws of heresy against the deceit of idolatry
Against the spell of women, magicians and wizards
Against all knowledge which binds the soul of man
Christ protect me this day
Against poison,
Against burning,
Against drowning
Against wounding
That I may receive abundant reward
Christ be with me, Christ be before me
Christ be after me, Christ be within me
Christ be beneath me, Christ be above me
Christ be at my right hand, Christ be at my left
Christ be in the fort, Christ be in the chariot
Christ be in the ship
Christ be in the heart of every man who thinks of me
Christ be in the mouth of every man who speaks of me,
Christ be in the eyes of every man that sees me
Christ be in every ear that hears me
I bind to myself this day
The strong faith of the invocation of the Holy Trinity,
The faith of the Trinity in unity
The creator of the elements
Salvation is the Lord’s
Salvation is from Christ
Thy salvation, O Lord be with us forever. Amen


Given by Malachy Mary Igwilo, Given within the Octave of Corpus Christi, 31st May, 2016 on the Feast day of St. Petronilla 

The “Mass” you go to every Sunday is the “Abomination of Desolation”


Work of Human Hands:



This book

(Works of Human hands: A Theological Critique of the Mass of Paul VI by Rev Anthony Cekada. Buy the book here: http://sggresources.org/products/work-of-human-hands-by-rev-anthony-cekada)

was sent to me by a friend who traveled to the USA. After reading this book, cover to cover twice, I have come to understand how powerful the Devil is and how he is gathering souls daily for damnation.


Indeed the “Mass” most of those calling themselves catholic attend is so evil that we need to do reparation DAILY to calm God’s anger. This false “Mass” is blasphemy and is an assault on the Majesty of God.


Indeed this false Mass is the “work of Human Hands”. It is not the Mass God taught the Church. It is not the Mass that is pleasing to God.

Many of those who call themselves “Catholic” are not aware that they have been shortchanged by those they trust most. The current “Mass” which 99% of “Catholics” attend every Sunday, and some daily, is an offense to God, even though the majority are not aware of it.

The fact that the majority are not aware of this tells a lot about the mental states of majority of those who call themselves Catholic. They are mostly ignorant and are being led to damnation by those they believe knows best.


The true Catholic Mass was truncated (actually, it was an attempt. But the Mass has survived in tact) by the Jewish Freemasonic infiltrator Giovanni Montini who the world knows as “Pope” Paul VI. This man, through the help of Protestant Ministers and “Archbishop” Anibale Bugnini crafted the current “mass” you attend! He crafted it and imposed in 1970.


Imagine the sound of it, that Protestants were invited to decide how Catholics ought to worship! This is not only insulting but Devilish!


But indeed they did it. They crafted a “Mass” for you, which is called “Novus Ordo Mass” and every Sunday you go there with family to offend God.
The prophet Daniel had already predicted the coming of the “Abomination of Desolation” (See Daniel 12:11).
This book is a MUST for anyone who is serious about his or her faith and wants to see how damaging and dangerous the current “Novus Ordo Mass” is and how dangerous those who “celebrate” it are.

The book is easy to read and it shows you everything about this new false Mass!

Many people will surely dismiss this because there are millions of people attending this false “Mass” and people the call “Father” “Bishop” “Cardinal” and “Pope” celebrate it and so how can all these people be wrong?

The people with this mind set should read the history of the Church! The Arian heresy nearly took the whole Church! Infact, it was heading in that directing until the Council of Nicaea official stated the true position of the Church and truth.

Other people will say “ah can you be more catholic than the pope”. But literally speaking, one can be more catholic than the pope if he defects from the faith just as Francis has done!

So think again!

Given by Malachy Mary Igwilo, Given within the Octave of Corpus Christi, 31st May, 2016 on the Feast day of St. Petronilla 







Friday, 27 May 2016

SSPX and Comedic Logic of Francis and His Novus Ordo Religion....




 


The SSPX, (Society of Saint Pius X) is a semi Traditional Organization that was protesting the new religion at the Vatican. 


It was established in 1974 by Archbishop Marcel Leferbvre who wanted to remain under the umbrella of Novus Ordo religion without agreeing with its heresies and indiciplines.


Under John Paul II, he, Leferbvre, engaged in many failed dialogues to physically merge his organization with Novus Ordo religion.

The same dialogue continued under Benedict XVI under a new superior, Bishop Bernard Fellay.


Now, Fellay is on the brink of giving SSPX over to Francis to destroy and this "giving over" is based on comedic logic that both counters Catholic theology of "Church" and conventional Logic!


It is funny that people remain in the SSPX despite this fuzzy logic and heretical ideas of ecclesiology.
 

 The Law of Non-Contradiction is one of the most basic laws in logic. It states that something cannot be  both true and not true at same time and under the same conditions. For example, the statement, "I am typing this in New York City right now" cannot be true and not true simultaneously. However, the "recognize and resist" (R&R) Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) and Mr. Bergoglio ("Pope" Francis) are going to try and prove that basic logic somehow doesn't apply to them.

"Pope" Francis has given an exclusive interview to the French Catholic La Croix newspaper published on May 17, 2016. In the interview, here is what was said:

"On April 1, you received Bishop Bernard Fellay, superior general of the Priestly Society of St Pius X. Is the re-integration of the Lefebvrists (sic) into the Church again under consideration?

Pope Francis: In Buenos Aires, I often spoke with them. They greeted me, asked me on their knees for a blessing. They say they are Catholic. They love the Church.


Bishop Fellay is a man with whom one can dialogue. That is not the case for other elements who are a little strange, such as Bishop Williamson or others who have been radicalized. Leaving this aside, I believe, as I said in Argentina, that they are Catholics on the way to full communion.



During this year of mercy, I felt that I needed to authorize their confessors to pardon the sin of abortion. They thanked me for this gesture. Previously, Benedict XVI, whom they greatly respect, had liberalized the use of the Tridentine rite mass(sic). So good dialogue and good work are taking place." (Emphasis mine)

I find it appropriate that the meeting took place on All Fools Day. Calling them "Lefebvrists" makes it seem like they are a "cult of personality" and an offshoot from the Catholic Church, when it is actually the Vatican II sect which has broken away. Unfortunately, some members of the SSPX, do treat the late Archbishop as some cult figure. This move away from authentic Catholicism and into the clutches of the Modernists is the sad result of acknowledging an apostate as "pope." While I'm a critic of Bp. Williamson myself, even a broken clock is right twice every 24 hours, and he is right not to want anything to do with Frankie. Refusal to succumb to Modernism is dubbed being "radicalized," but you won't hear Frankie use that term to identify Mohammedans. Even in discussing the possibility of absorbing the SSPX, we hear Bergoglio  use "Vatican II-speak" as the heretical ecclesiology rears its ugly head, i.e., "full communion," a phrase that clearly implies there can be "partial communion."

 In the good old days, there were three things you either were or were not. You could not be "a little bit" (or partially) dead, pregnant, or Catholic. That being said, let's see what Bp. Fellay said in an interview with The National Catholic Reporter:

According to Bishop Fellay, the Vatican is telling the society, through nuanced words, that it is now possible to question the Council’s teachings on religious liberty, ecumenism and liturgical reform "and remain Catholic."

"That means, also, the criteria they would impose on us, to have us prove to them that we are Catholic, will no longer be these points," he said. "That, to us, would be very important."


Let's see: The SSPX needs to prove to an apostate that  they are Catholic! There is also another important point to consider, namely, how do you call into question the teachings of an ecumenical Council "and remain Catholic"? The Magisterium teaches us and we obey. You can't question Trent on transubstantiation and "remain Catholic." Of course, the usual canard that "Vatican II was only a pastoral council, not a dogmatic council" will be brought up.  Both Fellay and Bergoglio must know that if you accept Montini (Paul VI) as a true pope (and they do), then Vatican II is obligatory and cannot be called into question.

 The end of each Vatican II document ends thus:

"Each and every matter declared in this Dogmatic Constitution the Fathers of this Sacred Council have approved. And We by the Apostolic Authority handed down to Us from Christ, together with all the Venerable Fathers, in the Holy Ghost approve, decree and establish these things; and all things thus synodally established, We order to be promulgated unto the glory of God...I, Paul, Bishop of the Catholic Church. There follow the signatures of the rest of the Fathers." (AAS 57 [1965], 71).

Vatican II is therefore part of the Universal and Ordinary Magisterium, to which all Catholics must submit. However, Frankie and Fellay think there's "wiggle room" for questioning that which must be obeyed.

Come to think of it, which Magisterium will they obey? On religious liberty will they obey the teaching of Pope Gregory XVI in Mirari Vos of August 15, 1832 (para. #14);

"This shameful font of indifferentism gives rise to that absurd and erroneous proposition which claims that liberty of conscience must be maintained for everyone. It spreads ruin in sacred and civil affairs, though some repeat over and over again with the greatest impudence that some advantage accrues to religion from it. "But the death of the soul is worse than freedom of error," as Augustine was wont to say. When all restraints are removed by which men are kept on the narrow path of truth, their nature, which is already inclined to evil, propels them to ruin."

Or will they obey Vatican II, Dignitatis Humanae of December 7, 1965;

"This Vatican Council declares that the human person has a right to religious freedom. This freedom means that all men are to be immune from coercion on the part of individuals or of social groups and of any human power, in such wise that no one is to be forced to act in a manner contrary to his own beliefs, whether privately or publicly, whether alone or in association with others, within due limits. The council further declares that the right to religious freedom has its foundation in the very dignity of the human person as this dignity is known through the revealed word of God and by reason itself. This right of the human person to religious freedom is to be recognized in the constitutional law whereby society is governed and thus it is to become a civil right."

So Fellay can believe that religious liberty is an "absurd and erroneous proposition" while Frankie can believe that it is a basic human right based "in the very dignity of the human person" and both belong to the same church?

Which Magisterium will they adhere to on ecumenism? The one where Pope Leo XIII teaches in Satis Cognitum of June 29, 1896 (para. # 4):

"For this reason Christ, speaking of the mystical edifice, mentions only one Church, which he calls His own - 'I will build my church; ' any other Church except this one, since it has not been founded by Christ, cannot be the true Church... to justify the existence of more than one Church it would be necessary to go outside this world, and to create a new and unheard - of race of men." 


Or will they obey what Vatican II taught in Unitatis Redintegratio of November 21, 1964 (para. # 3):

"It follows that the separated Churches (sic) and Communities as such, though we believe them to be deficient in some respects, have been by no means deprived of significance and importance in the mystery of salvation. For the Spirit of Christ has not refrained from using them as means of salvation which derive their efficacy from the very fullness of grace and truth entrusted to the Church."

Fellay can believe that the Church is the One True Church of Christ while Bergoglio believes the Church subsists in "separated churches"  that are "a means of salvation" just like the Catholic Church? Which is it? Is the Church the only Ark of Salvation, or can salvation be achieved in various separated sects?

 The La Croix interview has Begoglio saying this:

"Would you be ready to grant them (SSPX) the status of a personal prelature?


Pope Francis: That would be a possible solution but beforehand it will be necessary to establish a fundamental agreement with them. The Second Vatican Council has its value. We will advance slowly and patiently."

Yes. Frankie wants the R&R world to advance along the wide road towards Hell as he patiently awaits their demise by joining his world wide apostate sect. They must fundamentally agree that contradictory views can be maintained simultaneously. The value of Vatican II is that truth and logic make no difference in life. Believe as you choose, so long as you don't believe in the Truth. Fellay will get his personal prelature in return for his soul. They will begin by having their apostolic succession wiped out as phony Vatican II "cardinals" perform invalid "ordinations." The faithful will be given invalid sacraments and doctrines tainted with more and more Modernism, until they are simply Modernists with some Latin thrown in.

Fellay will learn too late what St. Paul meant when he wrote, "Bear not the yoke with unbelievers. For what participation hath justice with injustice? Or what fellowship hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? Or what part hath the faithful with the unbeliever?" (2 Corinthians 6:14-15)

Written by 
Introibo Ad Altare Dei

Liberalism is a Mortal Sin!







I found this book at the website novusordowatch.com(The entire book is available online for free http://www.liberalismisasin.com/) At the time, I was in the process of converting to traditional Catholicism, and I was interested in seeing Fr. Sarda's refutation of liberalism in more detail, especially since I had once self-identified as a liberal. I accepted everything that honors man. I supported Vatican II, anti pope John Paul II, and everything Vatican II. But as I discovered that these are the expressway to hell, I wanted out. Indeed a friend led me through discovering the true catholic church. This book helped to reshape my intellect aligning it with the Church intellect.


This book defines liberalism broadly, as the rejection of God's - and subsequently, the Church's - authority. Thus liberalism is really wider in scope than mere political liberalism. Two points have really resounded with me. 1) Since Satan was the first to reject God, “Satan was the first liberal”. 2) Because all Protestants reject the Catholic Faith and the Church's authority, “all Protestants are liberals”. I find this second point rather ironic when reflecting on American politics, where we constantly and erroneously describe the Protestant "fundamentalist right" as conservative. In fact, they are extreme liberals.

Fr. Sarda also addresses those who reject the Syllabus of Errors of pope Pius IX, which nearly all self-described "Catholics" do today and ALL who claim to be members of the “hierarchy”. These proves that the current “hierarchy” is not Catholic by any shred. These people are liberals who reject the Church's authority. His discussion is pertinent to the Novus Ordo (those who follow the Second Vatican Council), who reject many of the previous Church teachings on such topics as religious freedom and salvation (i.e. ex ecclesiam nulla salus). Because the Novus Ordo rejects Church teachings, it is just as liberal as Protestantism.


 Liberals will either hate this book because of their own bad wills, or they will be converted. So buy this book and give a “Catholic” today.


I may some day buy a lot of this books to distribute at our chapel. I believe this book is especially important because many of those who consider themselves "traditionalist" Catholics have fallen into liberal errors and may not even realize it, example the SSPX. This book is highly recommended.
Those who are still wondering if the Novus Ordo religion is the Catholic Church of Our Lord Jesus Christ will now, through this book know the facts.


The Novus Ordo religion which bifurcates itself into “conservative” and “;liberal” is nothing but a devilish CONPLETELY liberal religion of the Devil.
This book will help you make sense of it all.


By Malachy Mary Igwilo, given within the Octave of Corpus Christi, on the Feast day of St. Bede the venerable, 27th May, 2016