Since 1958, at the false election of Angelo Roncalli,
as John XXIII, the Catholic Church has had no popes till date. The Masonic forces
finally found a way to infiltrate the Catholic Church and usurped the papacy!
To know more about this apostate, John XXIII, click here to learn more about
the Masonic command for the infiltration of the Catholic Church, click here.
Other antipopes have since occupied Rome since John XXIII.
These are Govanni Montini (Anti Pope Paul VI), Albino Luciano (Anti Pope John
Paul I), Karol Wojtyla (Anti Pope John Paul II), Josef Ratzinger (Anti Pope Benedict
XVI) and now, Jorge Bergoglio (Anti Pope Francis).
These men who claimed to be popes in the Catholic
Church are NOT even Catholics to start with and yet nearly the whole world acknowledged them as popes due
to lack of knowledge of integral Catholicism!
They are not Catholics because they do not hold the
same faith as Catholics!
It is indeed urgent to restate again the true Catholic
position on how to understand what is currently going on in the Catholic
Church! The website novusordowatch.com has recently shown the necessity of
sedevacantism and this is what is restated here for posterity.
The true Catholic position today is called “Sedevacantism”,
which means that the seat of Peter, the See of Rome is vacant. Anyone who does
not hold this position errs on the part of doctrine or is not Catholic
altogether!
Many who knows about the state of the Church, as indeed
being in the state of sedevacante and yet believe that the false Church at the Vatican
is Catholic are NOT Catholics!
We know that the Church is in sedevacante due to
false new doctrines being taught by the new false religion at the Vatican. So
the following Video helps a new comer to understand one of such false teachings
coming from the Vatican, in particular the false doctrine on ecclesiology, that is the nature of the Church. The video is
simple to understand.
Just Watch:
The first part of this video series puts before the
viewer the Second Vatican Council’s new doctrine on the Church (ecclesiology),
according to which the Church of Jesus Christ no longer is the
Catholic Church, as taught by Pope Pius XII and all of his predecessors, but
instead now “subsists in” it. This bizarre new teaching is typically known as communio ecclesiology,
elements ecclesiology, “Frankenchurch”, or — our preferred
term — patchwork ecclesiology, because it holds that the Church of Jesus
Christ exists in elements:
The Catholic Church has all of them, but various
other religions also have some of them and hence there exists
a “partial communion” between them and the “Catholic” (i.e. Novus
Ordo) Religion.
This video shows that the authentic and
authoritative post-conciliar interpretation of the “subsists in” clause
confirms that the doctrine has indeed changed and that the novel teaching is,
by implication, heretical, for it creates a real distinction between the
Church founded by Christ and the Catholic Church, whereas the truth is that the
two are absolutely identical.
In 1868, when convoking the First Vatican
Council, Pope Pius IX was blissfully unaware of the “partial communion”
Protestants supposedly enjoy with the Catholic Church:
"Now, whoever will carefully examine and reflect upon
the condition of the various religious societies, divided among themselves, and
separated from the Catholic Church, which, from the days of our Lord Jesus
Christ and his Apostles has never ceased to exercise, by its lawful pastors,
and still continues to exercise, the divine power committed to it by this same
Lord; cannot fail to satisfy himself that neither any one of these societies by
itself, nor all of them together, can in any manner constitute and be that One
Catholic Church which Christ our Lord built, and established, and willed should
continue; and that they cannot in any way be said to be branches or parts of
that Church, since they are visibly cut off from Catholic unity. For, whereas
such societies are destitute of that living authority established by God, which
especially teaches men what is of Faith, and what the rule of morals, and
directs and guides them in all those things which pertain to eternal salvation,
so they have continually varied in their doctrines, and this change and
variation is ceaselessly going on among them. Every one must perfectly
understand, and clearly and evidently see, that such a state of things is
directly opposed to the nature of the Church instituted by our Lord Jesus Christ;
for in that Church truth must always continue firm and ever inaccessible to all
change, as a deposit given to that Church to be guarded in its integrity, for
the guardianship of which the presence and aid of the Holy Ghost have been
promised to the Church for ever"
(Pope Pius IX, Apostolic Letter, Iam Vos Omnes)
Here we can see that in no way could the Vatican II
teaching be considered a “development” of doctrine because no authentic
development can contradict prior teaching — it can only make it clearer.
But it doesn’t get any clearer than saying that the Catholic Church is the
Church established by our Lord Jesus Christ.
Funny, but somehow everyone understands what the
term “is” means in this context, whereas most people have trouble
with “subsists in”. This is also evident from daily life: If you say that
this woman is your mother-in-law, everyone understands what you are
saying. But try telling your friends that your mother-in-law subsists in this
woman, and see if they think you’ve made anything more clear. Good luck.
When analyzing Vatican II’s new ecclesiology, it is
also helpful to look at the motive for changing the
straightforward “is” into “subsists in”. The reason why the
true Catholic doctrine was changed at Vatican II can be summed up in one word:
ecumenism.
As Bishop Donald Sanborn has pointed out multiple times, one cannot practice
Vatican II ecumenism while insisting that the Catholic Church alone is true
Church of Jesus Christ and all other “churches” are heretical sects that
have no right to exist.
Hence the teaching had to be muddied, and the
perfect way to do that was to pretend that the new subsistit in formulation
was somehow making the teaching of Pius XII “more precise”. Of course it
did no such thing, and the ultimate proof of this is that all the
heretical “Christian” sects that practice ecumenism with the Novus Ordo
Religion would be absolutely horrified if the Vatican all of a sudden told them
now that the Catholic Church alone is the true Church Jesus Christ, that their
own “churches” are bogus, and that they must convert to Catholicism if
they wish to be saved.
In 1977, about a year before he became "Pope" John Paul II, the Polish “cardinal” Karol Wojtyla stated explicitly that
the Second Vatican Council’s teaching had changed the very nature of
the Church:
“The Church ... succeeded, during the second Vatican
Council, in re-defining her own nature” (Wojtyla, Sign of Contradiction, p. 17).
Think about what Wojtyla is saying here: that the
council defined a new church into existence, that the church of and after Vatican
II is not the same church as the one prior. That’s what redefining the nature of
the church means, for the nature makes a thing what it is.
In 2004, Bp. Donald Sanborn had a fiery debate with
Novus Ordo theologian Dr. Robert Fastiggi on precisely this partial-communion
ecclesiology of Vatican II. You can watch the video for free at the following
link:
We hope that this first video in the Introduction
to Sedevacantism series will be helpful to many. Be sure to share it with
friends and family, co-workers and fellow-parishioners. Ask them for their
opinion of the video — that’s always a good conversation starter.
For those who are interested in “more”, we
recommend the following two videos:
Presented by Malachy Mary Igwilo, on the feast Day
of St. Augustine, 28th August, 2016
Related Links:
No comments:
Post a Comment