Those
who do not adore Mary, as Mother of God are children of the Devil. These will
surely NOT inherit the kingdom since to reject Mary is to reject Christ.
Never mind
the shouting of ‘In Jesus Name’ that fills the world today. The Jesus which the
haters of Mary are calling is NOT the Lord Jesus Christ who is the Son of Mary.
It is another Jesus created and presented by the Devil and which millions gladly
accept while on their way to damnation.
How sad
it is that people with their eyes open reject Mary, Mother of the true Jesus
and maintain this rejection at all cost! They refuse to venerate Her, honor Her
or have anything to do with the Mother of God, the Son from whose death
redemption was given to the world!
What an
easy way to lose one’s soul!
The
Bible shows us many things about Mary even before Mary was born as the purest
of ALL human beings. When Mary was eventually born, her life represented what
is already foretold and what happened.
Today,
the true ONE TRUE Church, the Catholic Church venerates Mary as the new Eve and
as the New Ark of the Covenant! Imagine this Plan of God which shows who Mary
is!
On the
day of the inauguration of the original Ark of Covenant in the Old Testament,
there were 120 priests present for this inauguration and they officiated using
the trumpet. (2 Chronicles 5:12). That same day, Fire came down from heaven and
consumed the Sacrifice as a sign of the Old Covenant based on the Ark!
Compare this
with what happened at Pentecost. 120 Apostles and Disciples were present as
well with the New Ark of the New Covenant, Mary! Also Fire came down from
heaven and ‘consumed’ those present! They were made new and they were used for
the propagation of the Gospel and as sign of a New Covenant represent by Mary! (cf.
Acts 1:15)
The question that would arise in the minds of those
who hate Mary or those who are confused of Her plenitude of Grace given to Her
by God is:
Why do Catholics call Mary the Ark of the New
Covenant? Answering that question will take us on a thrilling journey through
the Old and New Testaments.
For example, Luke wove some marvelous things into his Gospel that only a
knowledgeable Jew would have understood—a Jew who knew Jewish Scripture and had
eyes to see and ears to hear. One of the things he would have understood is
typology.
We all know that the Old Testament is full of stories,
people, and historical events. A type is a person, thing, or event in
the Old Testament that foreshadows something in the New Testament. It is like a
taste or a hint of something that will be fulfilled or realized. Types are like
pictures that come alive in a new and exciting way when seen through the eyes
of Christ’s revelation. The Great St. Augustine said that "the Old
Testament is the New concealed, but the New Testament is the Old revealed"
(Catechizing of the Uninstructed 4:8).
The idea of typology is not new. Paul says that Adam
was a type of the one who was to come—Christ (Rom 5:14). Early Christians
understood that the Old Testament was full of types or pictures that were
fulfilled or realized in the New Testament.
Here are a few more examples of biblical typology:
Peter uses Noah’s ark as a type of Christian baptism
(1 Pt 3:18-22).
Paul explains that circumcision foreshadowed
Christian baptism (Col 2:11-12).
Jesus uses the bronze serpent as a type of his
Crucifixion represented in the image of the Crucifix, the cross with the image of Christ on it. (Jn 3:14; cf. Nm 21:8-9).
The Passover lamb prefigures the sacrifice of Christ
(1 Cor 5:7).
Paul says that Abraham "considered that God was
able to raise men even from the dead; hence, figuratively speaking, he did
receive him back" (Heb 11:19).
The Ark of the Old Covenant
God loved his people and wanted to be close to them.
He chose to do so in a very special way. The prayer of the people of God flourished in the
shadow of the dwelling place of God’s presence on earth, the ark of the
covenant and the temple, under the guidance of their shepherds, especially King
David, and of the prophets.
God instructed Moses to build a
tabernacle surrounded by heavy curtains (cf. Ex 25-27). Within the tabernacle
he was to place an ark made of acacia wood covered with gold inside and out.
Within the Ark of the Covenant was placed a golden jar holding the manna,
Aaron’s rod that budded, and the stone tablets of the covenant (cf. Heb 9:4).
When the ark was completed, the glory cloud of the Lord (the Shekinah Glory)
covered the tent of meeting, and the glory of the Lord filled the tabernacle
(Ex 40:34-35; Nm 9:18, 22). The verb for "to cover" or "to
overshadow" and the metaphor of a cloud are used in the Bible to represent
the presence and glory of God.
The Church explains that in the theophanies of the Old Testament, the cloud,
now obscure, now luminous, reveals the living and saving God, while veiling the
transcendence of his glory—with Moses on Mount Sinai, at the tent of meeting,
and during the wandering in the desert, and with Solomon at the dedication of
the temple. In the Holy Spirit, Christ fulfills these figures.
The Spirit comes
upon the Virgin Mary and "overshadows" her, so that she might
conceive and give birth to Jesus. On the mountain of Transfiguration, the
Spirit in the "cloud came and overshadowed" Jesus, Moses and Elijah,
Peter, James and John, and "a voice came out of the cloud, saying, ‘This
is my Son, my Chosen; listen to him!’" Finally, the cloud took Jesus out
of the sight of the disciples on the day of his Ascension and will reveal him
as Son of Man in glory on the day of his final coming. The glory of the Lord
"overshadowed" the ark and filled the tabernacle.
It’s easy to miss the parallel between the Holy
Spirit overshadowing the ark and the Holy Spirit overshadowing Mary, between
the Ark of the Old Covenant as the dwelling place of God and Mary as the new
dwelling place of God.
God was very specific about every exact detail of the ark (Ex 25-30). It was a
place where God himself would dwell (Ex 25:8). God wanted his words—inscribed
on stone—housed in a perfect container covered with pure gold within and
without. How much more would he want his Word—Jesus—to have a perfect dwelling
place! If the only begotten Son were to take up residence in the womb of a
human girl, would he not make her flawless?
The Virgin Mary is the living shrine of the Word of
God, the Ark of the New and Eternal Covenant. In fact, St. Luke’s account of
the Annunciation of the angel to Mary nicely incorporates the images of the
tent of meeting with God in Sinai and of the temple of Zion. Just as the cloud
covered the people of God marching in the desert (cf. Nm 10:34; Dt 33:12; Ps
91:4) and just as the same cloud, as a sign of the divine mystery present in
the midst of Israel, hovered over the Ark of the Covenant (cf. Ex 40:35), so
now the shadow of the Most High envelops and penetrates the tabernacle of the
New Covenant that is the womb of Mary (cf. Lk 1:35).
King David and Elizabeth
Luke weaves additional parallels into the story of
Mary—types that could be overlooked if one is unfamiliar with the Old
Testament. After Moses died, Joshua led the Israelites across the Jordan River
into the Promised Land. Joshua established the Ark of the Covenant in Shiloh,
where it stayed for more than 200 years. One day the Israelites were losing a
battle with the Philistines, so they snatched the ark and rushed it to the
front lines. The Philistines captured the ark, but it caused them great
problems, so they sent it back to Israel (1 Sm 5:1-6:12).
David went out to retrieve the ark (1 Sm 6:1-2). After a man named Uzzah was
struck dead when he touched the ark, David was afraid and said, "How can
the ark of the Lord come to me?" He left the ark in the hill country of
Judea for three months. We are also told that David danced and leapt in front
of the ark and everyone shouted for joy. The house of Obed-edom, which had
housed the ark, was blessed, and then David took the ark to Jerusalem (2 Sm
6:9-14).
Compare David and the ark to Luke’s account of the Visitation:
Compare David and the ark to Luke’s account of the Visitation:
In those days Mary arose and went with haste into
the hill country, to a city of Judah, and she entered the house of Zechariah
and greeted Elizabeth. And when Elizabeth heard the greeting of Mary, the babe
leaped in her womb; and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit and she
exclaimed with a loud cry, "Blessed are you among women, and blessed is
the fruit of your womb! And why is this granted me, that the mother of my Lord
should come to me? For behold, when the voice of your greeting came to my ears,
the babe in my womb leaped for joy. And blessed is she who believed that there
would be a fulfillment of what was spoken to her from the Lord." (Lk
1:39-45)
Mary arose and went to the hill country of Judea. The place Elizabeth lived in is today's Ein Kerem (where Elizabeth lived) and Abu Ghosh (where the
ark resided). Today we have seen that these two places are only a short walk apart. Visitors to Israel can confirm this. Mary and the ark were both
on a journey to the same hill country of Judea.
When David saw the ark he rejoiced and said,
"How can the ark of the Lord come to me?" Elizabeth uses almost the
same words: "Why is this granted me, that the mother of my Lord should
come to me?" Luke is telling us something—drawing our minds back to the
Old Testament, showing us a parallel.
When David approached the ark he shouted out and
danced and leapt in front of the ark. He was wearing an ephod, the clothing of
a priest. When Mary, the Ark of the New Covenant, approached Elizabeth, John
the Baptist leapt in his mother’s womb—and John was from the priestly line of
Aaron. Both leapt and danced in the presence of the ark. The Ark of the Old
Covenant remained in the house of Obed-edom for three months, and Mary remained
in the house of Elizabeth for three months. The place that housed the ark for
three months was blessed, and in the short paragraph in Luke, Elizabeth uses
the word blessed three times. Her home was certainly blessed by the presence of
the ark and the Lord within.
When the Old Testament ark arrived—as when Mary
arrived—they were both greeted with shouts of joy. The word for the cry of
Elizabeth’s greeting is a rare Greek word used in connection with Old Testament
liturgical ceremonies that were centered around the ark and worship (cf. Word
Biblical Commentary, 67). This word would flip on the light switch for any
knowledgeable Jew and a good bible student.
The ark returns to its home and ends up in
Jerusalem, where God’s presence and glory is revealed in the temple (2 Sm 6:12;
1 Kgs 8:9-11). Mary returns home and eventually ends up in Jerusalem, where she
presents God incarnate in the temple (Lk 1:56; 2:21-22).
It seems clear that Luke has used typology to reveal
something about the place of Mary in salvation history. In the Ark of the Old
Covenant, God came to his people with a spiritual presence, but in Mary, the
Ark of the New Covenant, God comes to dwell with his people not only
spiritually but physically, in the womb of a specially prepared Jewish girl.
The Old Testament tells us that one item was placed inside the Ark of the Old
Covenant while in the Sinai wilderness: God told Moses to put the stone tablets
with the Ten Commandments inside the ark (Dt 10:3-5). Hebrews 9:4 informs us
that two additional items were placed in the Ark: "a golden urn holding
the manna, and Aaron’s rod that budded." Notice the amazing parallels: In
the ark was the law of God inscribed in stone; in Mary’s womb was the Word of
God in flesh. In the ark was the urn of manna, the bread from heaven that kept
God’s people alive in the wilderness; in Mary’s womb is the Bread of Life come
down from heaven that brings eternal life. In the ark was the rod of Aaron, the
proof of true priesthood; in Mary’s womb is the true priest. In the third
century, St. Gregory the Wonder Worker said that Mary is truly an
ark—"gold within and gold without, and she has received in her womb all
the treasures of the sanctuary."
While the apostle John was exiled on the island of Patmos, he wrote something
that would have shocked any first-century Jew. The ark of the Old Covenant had
been lost for centuries—no one had seen it for about 600 years. But in
Revelation 11:19, John makes a surprising announcement: "Then God’s temple
in heaven was opened, and the ark of his covenant was seen within his
temple."
At this point chapter 11 ends and chapter 12 begins. But the Bible was not
written with chapter divisions—they were added in the 12th century. When John
penned these words, there was no division between chapters 11 and 12; it was a
continuing narrative.
What did John say immediately after seeing the Ark of the Covenant in heaven?
"And a great portent appeared in heaven, a woman clothed with the sun,
with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars; she was
with child" (Rv 12:1-2). The woman is Mary, the Ark of the Covenant,
revealed by God to John. She was seen bearing the child who would rule the
world with a rod of iron (Rv 12:5). Mary was seen as the ark and as a queen.
But does this passage really refer to Mary? Some say the woman represents
Israel or the Church, and certainly she does. John’s use of rich symbolism is
well known, but it is obvious from the Bible itself that the woman is Mary. The
Bible begins with a real man (Adam), a real woman (Eve), and a real serpent
(the devil)—and it also ends with a real man (Jesus, the Last Adam [1 Cor
15:45]), a real woman (Mary, the New Eve [Rv 11:19-12:2]), and a real serpent
(the devil of old). All of this was foretold in Genesis 3:15.
John Henry Cardinal Newman wrote about this passage in Revelation:
What I would maintain is this, that the Holy Apostle
would not have spoken of the Church under this particular image unless there
had existed a Blessed Virgin Mary, who was exalted on high and the object of
veneration to all the faithful. No one doubts that the "man-child"
spoken of is an allusion to our Lord; why then is not "the Woman" an
allusion to his mother? (On the Blessed Virgin Mary)
Later in the same chapter we read that the devil
went out to persecute the woman’s other offspring—Christians—which certainly
seems to indicate that Mary is somehow the mother of the Church (Rv 12:17).
Even if someone rejects Catholic teaching regarding Mary which is unfortunate, if the person has ANY honesty at all in him, he cannot deny that
Catholics have scriptural foundations for it. And it is a teaching that has
been taught by Christians from ancient times. Here are a few representative
quotations from the early Church—some written well before the New Testament
books were officially compiled by the Catholic Church, into the final New Testament canon:
St. Athanasius of Alexandria (c. 296–373) was the main defender of the deity
of Christ against the second-century Arian heretics. He wrote:
"O noble Virgin,
truly you are greater than any other greatness. For who is your equal in
greatness, O dwelling place of God the Word? To whom among all creatures shall
I compare you, O Virgin? You are greater than them all O [Ark of the] Covenant,
clothed with purity instead of gold! You are the ark in which is found the
golden vessel containing the true manna, that is, the flesh in which divinity
resides" (Homily of the Papyrus of Turin).
St. Gregory the Wonder Worker (c. 213–c. 270) wrote: "Let us chant the
melody that has been taught us by the inspired harp of David, and say, ‘Arise,
O Lord, into thy rest; thou, and the ark of thy sanctuary.’ For the Holy Virgin
is in truth an ark, wrought with gold both within and without, that has
received the whole treasury of the sanctuary" (Homily on the Annunciation
to the Holy Virgin Mary).
The early Christians taught the same thing that the Catholic Church teaches today about Mary, including her being the Ark of the New Covenant
The early Christians taught the same thing that the Catholic Church teaches today about Mary, including her being the Ark of the New Covenant
So let the haters of Mary, especially those who
promote this hatred, Novus Ordo/Vatican II religion wake up and convert urgently to save their souls!
Presented by Malachy Mary Igwilo, 23rd
August in the Month of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, 2017, Feast of St. Philip Benizi,
eve of St. Bartholomew the Apostle.
No comments:
Post a Comment