Shame to the Soul Killer John Paul II: Your Apology was Appalling!

Sometime ago on June 15 2004, the Apostate in Chief of Novus Ordo/Vatican II religions released a document called Tertio millennio adveniente, accusing the Catholic Church of having committed series of Atrocities especially during the Inquisition era and which requires a solemn and official apology to the victims and the world!  He went ahead to do “mea culpa” on these imagined “sins of the Church”!

But John Paul II as a non-Catholic apologized for nothing but he was trying to join heretical Protestants and other haters of the Catholic Church in suggesting that the Catholic Church, the Holy Bride of Christ committed atrocities as an institution and therefore apologies are needed!

But we know the truth now! The Catholic Church has no need to apologize for anything! Indeed it is the World, including John Paul II of the most unfortunate memory that should apologize to the Church for centuries of calumny and defamation.

Twenty years or more ago, the then Grand Apostate. “Cardinal” Joseph Ratzinger, who later claimed to be “Pope Benedict XVI” as head of the Novus Ordo Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, decided to open up to  world scholars the secret Vatican archives on the Inquisition, including records of the Index of Forbidden Books. It was the last Vatican secret archive never opened, supposedly because it was filled with many “bogeymans” and “evidences of cruelty” on the part of the Church and the Church was hiding these in the archives!

Mind you the archives are Catholic archives and Josef Ratzinger had no rights to tamper with it. But as part of the Masonic takeover of the Catholic buildings and offices, the archives fell into the hands of the more abominable people! 

The world media celebrated this opening saying “What courage and openness on the part of the Church”! This is how the news media raved back then in 1998 over the decision to make this supposed ominous chest of bad deeds public.

For the results would undoubtedly reveal the abuses of power, arbitrary judgments and cruel unjust sentences made by fanatical Inquisitors. Research would divulge a shameful past demanding reparation, which would justify the formal apologies for the Inquisition issued by the grand Apostate, john Paul II, along with the many informal ones made by the anti-Popes after him. This was what was supposed by many haters of the Church and those influenced by the myth that the Church was evil.

The decision to open the 4,500 volumes of documents dating from 1542-1903 was also made as one way to repair the Vatican's supposed suspect image of secrecy .“We know all the sins of the Church,” Card. Ratzinger dryly said at the time. ''And I hope more will not be added to them.” Apparently, Ratzinger himself was also supposing that the Church will further be diminished as part of his and his religion’s push to obliterate the Catholic Church from the Earth.

The clear insinuation of Ratzinger was that, to the known “sins of the Inquisition,” others would be added, no doubt shaming the Church but also showing the Church's willingness to undertake the general "examination of conscience" that John Paul II had demanded. Another step in the idiotic idea of  “purifying the Church” and bringing her up to date with the modern world, a continuation of  Aggiornamento of the apostate, John XXIII.

When the news was released that the archives would be opened, there was little doubt in the mind of most churchmen and scholars that the investigation would produce a dismal fallout for the Vatican.

Since the 16th century, the Inquisition in popular consciousness and myth industry, with no objection from the Novus Ordo/Vatican II religion, has been presented unrelentingly by Protestants, Jews, Illuminati and their cohorts, as a Church organ with enormous powers that tortured its victims to get forced confessions and then burned those she called heretics at the stake.

According to this famous Black Legend the main targets of this monstrous institution called the Inquisition, were Protestants, Jews and scientists like Galileo.- The invention of the printing press came at the right time to facilitate the spread of this harmful reputation about the Church everywhere.

The recently opened archives of the Inquisition concerned primarily the Holy Office of the Roman Inquisition founded in 1542 by Pope Paul III to be a central organ of the Holy See to battle the Protestant Revolution. Since it was pontifical, it had universal jurisdiction, although it allowed the Spanish Inquisition to exercise its own powers. For the Novus Ordo religion, the very name Inquisition was so reprehensible that the name Holy Office was replaced by the so-called “Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith”.

Now finally, after 20 years of meticulous study, by scholars who were not even Catholics, the results of 40 scholars delving into the archives of the real, not imaginary, Inquisition were released in an 800-page tome.

The startling news published in a silent article in L'Osservatore Romano(May 19, 2018, p. 5) was that the Inquisition was in fact a good and fair tribunal, not the dark horror chamber invented by the Black Legend. If it were about denigrating the Church this “pope’s” newspaper would have shouted more! But not it tactically buried the news inside the pages to prevent it from being known!

Twenty years of studies on the central archives of the Holy Office have shown that in fact the Church has nothing to apologize for.

In the concluding reports of the three day Congress of studies (May 15-17), the participating scholars declared that the evidence of the Inquisition's history did not correspond to the negative image presented by 19th century romantic novels, 20th century cinematography and the general media of our days. The legend that has become the mandatory “objective history” presented by almost all school history books was effectively debunked. John Paul II should be turning in shame in his grave! Just like John XXIII was found faced down in his grave when he was called out for the Novus Ordo false canonization!

Following its modernist and heretical orientation, the article in the Vatican newspaper reporting on the Congress tried to mute these stupendous results. It barely reported the implications of these findings.

It emphasized instead the historic method the scholars employed to analyze the data.

But it is clear that the researchers were unable to report cases of injustices, abuses, arbitrary actions and tortures. If they could have found such incidents of prejudice and cruelty, I have no doubt the report of their conclusions would have been on the front page of the Vatican newspaper to confirm the constant remorse the Novus Ordo anti-Popes have shown for the Inquisition.

What the scholars found, however, was that the Roman Inquisition was rightly considered the fairest and most balanced court of its day, prefiguring in many ways the modern court system. It was born not from a cruel and unjust intolerance, but from the need to provide fair trials for persons accused of heresy using laws of evidence and presided over by highly qualified judges. For example, any defendant could have an attorney, a right not yet introduced in secular courts at the time.

This favorable view had already being presented by many modern scholars like John Tedeschi, whose research had led him to the conclusion that the Roman Inquisition was “actually a very advanced tribunal and dispensed a very high level of law in 16th century terms.”

The scholars who entered the Vatican archives came to much the same conclusion. As this new report confirms, most persons accused of heresy by the Inquisition were either acquitted or their sentences suspended. Those found guilty of grave error were allowed to confess their sins, do penance and be readmitted to the Sacraments. Unrepentant or obstinate heretics were excommunicated and handed over to secular authorities. It was the secular authorities that held heresy to be a capital offense and issued the final sentence, not the Catholic Church.

The images of witch-hunting are caricatures and lies.

Now, whoever goes to the archives, instead of relying on Black Legend fabrications and myths, will find an unexpected truth: The real Inquisition was a praiseworthy judicial institution. By the way, serious historians did not need to wait for the archives to be opened: Even the BBC, a modernist mouth piece (as you can read here) has had the honesty to present a new notion of the Inquisition based on already available evidence.

One would expect that these unexpected good results of 20 years of meticulous research on the Inquisition would be a hot topic in the Catholic press. The truth is that the thee-day Symposium held in Rome was summarized in a short article on page 5 in the L'Osservatore Romano; nothing more. No exultant titles in the Catholic organs “Inquisition vindicated! “John Paul II needed not apologize”, etc. such headlines did not come up! There was just general silence!

Also, I doubt we should expect  Mr. Bergoglio to nullify the past Novus Ordo apologies for sins the Church did not commit. If he were a just man, he would do so. But of course we know who the man is.  I am betting he will ignore the findings and say nothing.

I hope, however, that these new conclusions will encourage honest scholars to deepen their research on the topic so that the myth of a cruel and unjust Inquisition will be put to rest once and for all. Let the real Inquisition emerge into the light to show a balanced and enlightened tribunal, a model even for a future more glorious era in the Church and History. Let John Paul II and his religion be ashamed for denigrating the Church!

Presented by Malachy Igwilo, Feast of Corpus Christi, 31 May 2018

Finally, Homosexuals are getting a “Patron Saint”, Paul VI to be “Canonized” by Mr. Bergoglio!

The Soul Killer in Chief of the Novus Ordo/Vatican II religion, Mr. Jorg Bergoglio has announced that he will imitate the Catholics and “canonize” Paul VI as Saint together with others on the 14th of October!

Remember that Paul VI is the “formaldehyde Paul”? When Paul VI died in 1978, Time magazine reported that for some reason, his body was so smelly that they authorities had to inject more formaldehyde into his for the lying in state. This is why the man has go the name “formaldehyde Paul”.

The point really is that Paul VI, a homosexual and the implementer of the Vatican II butchery of the Catholic doctrines in Novus Ordo, is going to be called a “saint”! In other words, Novus Ordo people, imitating the Catholics are called to venerate Paul VI as a “holy person in heaven”! They should also imitate him, including the fact that fingers point that he was a homosexual!

Maybe when he is “canonized”, Francis will declare him “patron saint of those who God made Homosexuals”.

The case of Paul VI being accused of being homosexual is serious and his supporters try hard to cover it up! Many saw many questionable characters visiting Paul VI at night, bypassing the Vatican protocols and going there on “a need to know” basis for the security details. He was also fingered by Italian police to be visiting hotels frequented by Homosexuals.

These accusations are rife and many people knew about it. A book was written called Nikita and Roncalli in which the sordid details of Roncali’s life and office was shown and people were shocked, but the man remain as the say “pope”!

Here is an important excerpt from the book in which the homosexuals accusation was made and how Paul VI personally appointed homosexuals to some offices inside the Vatican!

Note that the Paul VI Vatican press office or Paul VI himself did not debunk the claims of this book till date!

Here are the exact words of the book (please note that the author thinks that both Paul VI and John XXIII are popes):

“In Rome and throughout Italy the rumor is out that Montini would be a homosexual. Hence, vulnerable. Hence, open to those who aim to use him to achieve their own goals. 

When he was Archbishop of Milan, he would have been caught by the police one night wearing civilian clothes and in suspect company. Actually, for many years he had a special friendship with an actor who colors his hair red. This man did not make any secret of his relation with the future Pope. The relation continued and became much closer in the years ahead. [After Montini was elected Pope] an official of the Vatican security forces told me that this favorite of Montini was allowed to come and go freely in the pontifical apartments. And that he had often been seen taking the papal elevator at night. 

The "banana skin" that Paul VI slipped on and that put an end to the non-official nature of his weakness was the homily on sexual ethics he delivered in January 1976 dealing with some points on homosexuality. This homily provoked a reaction from the French writer Roger Peyrefitte. 

On April 4, 1976, the weekly Il Tempo published an interview with the author, who has the reputation for very good documentation … He accused the Pope of being a homosexual and denied his right to be a censor on the topic. Paul VI officially acknowledged the blow. 

A day of prayers "to make reparation for the offense received by the Pope" was called for. All of Italy, however, was laughing about the incident. British TV made an interview with Peyrefitte, who confirmed his accusations and expressed surprise over the publicity he was receiving. 

The first blackmail against Montini, as soon as he mounted the steps of the throne of Peter, was made by Freemasonry, which pressured him to do away with the Church’s condemnation of those who ask to be cremated after death [which he did]. What it threatened was to reveal the secret meetings between the Archbishop of Milan and "his" actor in a hotel in Sion, in the Valais canton in Switzerland. In Paris, sometime later, the story behind this change made by Paul VI surfaced, with the indisputable evidence patiently amassed by a gendarme [policeman] ... 

Another change observed by those in that narrow circle who, because of their rank or their posts, used to pass a large amount of time inside the Apostolic Palace, was the sudden appointment of homosexuals to positions of prestige and responsibility close to the Pope. This plague that would infest, transform, and devastate the Vatican during the time of Paul VI had already begun then [in the pontificate of John XXIII], well hidden in the baroque curtain folds of the Pontifical Court, but unfortunately alive and real. It was the distant hand of the Archbishop of Milan [Cardinal Montini], himself a victim of such weaknesses, that discreetly placed one after another on the State chessboard - the pieces of the game dear to his heart. 

Those highly situated new personages, who were contaminated by the same "sickness," naturally brought with them other less highly placed people of the same ilk. So, slowly but continuously, rumors and indiscretions began to flow in the Vatican, and grave facts began to occur as a matter of course. 

Because of their functions, these people were often seen by us [chamberlains and noble guards] principally during the visits of Sovereigns and heads of State to the Pope. 

They also had their favorites, who were the effeminate young men wearing elegant uniforms and make-up on their faces to dissimulate their beards. We – the camarieri di spada e cappa and noble guards – carefully kept our distance from their smiles and courtesies. We limited ourselves to greeting them at distance with a military salute of the heels. 

“Favorites" of the Archbishop of Milan also began to appear in the lower levels of service, and both small and large scandals at times would erupt. The Gendarmeria Pontificia [the Vatican police] had to steer carefully, as one says, along those floating mines and keep one eye closed – and sometimes both eyes – to keep reports from leaking and to discourage some astute journalists … 

Honorable old employees who relied on the Governatorato [the administration of the Vatican State] were, without any apparent reason, ordered to retire or sent elsewhere, and these newcomers were installed in their empty chairs, all them carrying in their pockets letters of recommendation from Cardinal Montini”

From the above we can see that we are looking at a Novus Ordo religion’s Patron Saint for “homosexuals” who Francis said are made by God! We can see that those who are in Novus Ordo can still claim to be Christian while at the same time accepting homosexuals as “being made by God” at least, the head of their false religion said it. If they do not support the belief of their head, they should speak out! Presented by Malachy Igwilo, Within the Octave of Pentecost, May 24, 2018 on the day of Our Lady help of Christians

Finally, a "pope" that is homosexual at Heart! His name is Mr. Jorg Bergoglio!

Mr. Bergoglio who goes by the name Francis has told a homosexual that he should not worry that God created him that way.  In order word, God made some people homosexual and so they can go on and commit the sin of homosexuality as they please!

So we finally have an impostor, claiming to have Papal authority, who has come out to support homosexuality openly without hiding like Paul VI (an actual homosexual) John Paul II and Benedict XVI.

This statement is not shocking to anyone who knows the false religion called Novus Ordo/Vatican II religion! This religion which the world thinks is the Catholic Church is out to send the whole world population to hell. That is the plan so there is nothing shocking about what Francis has said!

The Novus Ordo “canon law” compiled by the evil entity, John Paul II said that homosexuality is a disorder. Ask yourself why did he not say that homosexuality is a mortal sin? It is because they are planning to enthrone this grievous sin.

Francis has historically refused to condemn this grievous sin. He was presented some time ago with evidence that one of his henchmen was involved in homosexual ring, he said he cannot judge!

His “who am I to judge” statement endeared him to world’s homosexual band and he won “man of the year” title for many homosexual magazines!

When the new broke that Italian police broke up a homosexual party inside the Vatican, involving high-ranking “cardinals” and Vatican workers, he said absolutely nothing about it and the case was never heard of, again.

There is no doubt that many in Novus Ordo will dismiss this as a non-issue since it is public knowledge that homosexual relations are rife within the hierarchy of the Novus Ordo/Vatican II religion!

When the Vatican press office was asked to clarify what Francis told this homosexual man, the office claimed that they cannot comment on Francis’ personal conversation! Perfect!

The reason for this piece is to remind everyone reading this that the doctrines of Novus Ordo religion are NOT Catholic doctrines and those who think Francis is pope and his religion catholic are mistaken!

Francis’ words verbatim, translated from Spanish, were:

“Juan Carlos, that you are gay does not matter. God made you like that and he loves you like that and I do not care. The Pope loves you as you are, you have to be happy with who you are”

(translation by The Telegraph; Spanish original as reported in El País: “Juan Carlos, que tú seas gay no importa. Dios te hizo así y te quiere así y a mí no me importa. El Papa te quiere así, tú tienes que estar feliz con quien tú eres”).

These words are seriously wrong on many different levels.

First, the very idea of being gay, as it is called, is flawed. Sexual orientation is a made-up notion that does not reflect any reality. We cannot provide an in-depth critique of this now, but suffice it to say that while it is clear that there can be an experience of sexual attraction between members of the same sex, all sexuality is, by its very nature, oriented towards the other sex.

That is how God made it, and He did so for the sole primary purpose of procreation: “And God created man to his own image: to the image of God he created him: male and female he created them. And God blessed them, saying: Increase and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it…” (Gen 1:27-28). 

Although there are many different kinds of sins against purity, any sexual act that defeats this procreative purpose is among the most heinous: “Worst among the sins of impurity, as such, are crimes of unnatural lust, for they exercise the sexual act, not only illicitly, but also in a manner that defeats its purpose of reproduction”

(Rev. John A. McHugh & Rev. Charles J. Callan, Moral Theology, vol. 2 [New York, NY: Joseph F. Wagner, 1958], n. 2534; available online here.)

Second, by saying that God is the cause of same-sex attraction in Juan Carlos Cruz, Francis is blaspheming the Creator, for God desires all to be saved (see 1 Tim 2:4) and is not the cause of sin, which He hates: “In the morning I will stand before thee, and will see: because thou art not a God that willest iniquity…” (Ps 5:5);

“But to God the wicked and his wickedness are hateful alike” (Wis 14:9); “Say not: He hath caused me to err: for he hath no need of wicked men. The Lord hateth all abomination of error, and they that fear him shall not love it” (Ecclus [Sir] 15:12-13).

That God condemns sodomy as sinful should hardly require proof: “Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind, because it is an abomination” (Lev 18:22); “Nor the effeminate, nor liers with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor railers, nor extortioners, shall possess the kingdom of God” (1 Cor 6:10).

Third, by telling Cruz that God loves his being sexually attracted to men, Francis is saying that God loves homosexuality, another staggering blasphemy and heresy that surely needs no further comment.

Fourth, Francis says, “I do not care.” That is the only part of his remarks that one can believe wholeheartedly. When it comes to matters of Faith and morals and to the salvation of souls, we can be certain that Francis doesn’t give a hoot. Truer words have never been spoken.

Fifth, even if it were not sinful to hold that God is the cause of same-sex attraction in sodomites, there is simply no way Francis could possibly know that God “made” Juan Cruz this way. There is neither divine revelation nor empirical science to that effect.

For example, consider the expert opinion of Dr. Rudolf Allers, M.D., Ph.D. (1883-1963): “Obviously it is not an innate perversion which is unavoidable and for which there is no remedy. In many cases the mental background is easily discovered; in others the task is extremely difficult” (Dr. Rudolf Allers, Sex Psychology [Fort Collins, CO: Roman Catholic Books, 2006], p. 163; imprimatur 1937). Allers taught psychology at the Catholic University of America and “acted for seven years as an expert in the Ecclesiastical Court especially in matrimonial cases” 

(Matthew Hoehn, ed., Catholic Authors: Contemporary Biographical Sketches 1930-1947 [Newark, NJ: St. Mary’s Abbey, 1948], p. 7).

The very fact that human beings have wicked desires does not mean they are allowed to indulge in them. All sins and sinful inclinations have their root in original sin. Concupiscence, which is the continual inclination to do what is wrong, is one of the effects of original sin, and it is not wiped out by baptism. We must continually struggle to overcome concupiscence; hence the need for penance, mortification, prayer, and good works, all made fruitful and meritorious by the help of God’s grace.

But Francis, being a Naturalist, denies original sin and/or its consequences. He may pay lip service to the true Catholic teaching, but in practice he denies it. We see this in his claim that somebody’s same-sex attraction is not an evil that must be disapproved of and fought (as must other inclinations to evil, whether that be adultery, covetousness, blasphemy, pride, detraction, or anything else) but is a good that God has implanted in him and is no cause for concern, disapproval, or shame. In his comment to Cruz, Francis is explicitly encouraging those afflicted with same-sex attraction to embrace this inclination as good and desired, nay created, by God Himself, and that he should be happy in it! What an audacious blasphemy!

St. Paul the Apostle, inspired by God Himself, had a different take on this. In his letter to the Romans he put things in perspective:

Wherefore God gave them up to the desires of their heart, unto uncleanness, to dishonor their own bodies among themselves. Who changed the truth of God into a lie; and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen. For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature. And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error. And as they liked not to have God in their knowledge, God delivered them up to a reprobate sense, to do those things which are not convenient; being filled with all iniquity, malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness, full of envy, murder, contention, deceit, malignity, whisperers, detractors, hateful to God, contumelious, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, foolish, dissolute, without affection, without fidelity, without mercy. Who, having known the justice of God, did not understand that they who do such things, are worthy of death; and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them.

(Rom 1:24-32)

We must be clear that merely experiencing same-sex attraction is not sinful — sin is an act of the will, not a feeling. What is sinful is consenting to it, approving of it, acting on it, and claiming that such attraction is normal, legitimate, or healthy. It’s sinful because sexual attraction exists for sexual acts, and the primary purpose of sexuality is procreation, something that is intrinsically frustrated in unnatural acts.

Unnatural acts are, in the truest sense of the word, a perversion, meaning a turning away from the proper end (the Latin pervertere literally means “to turn to ill effect”). They are an abuse of the faculties God gave to man so he could produce offspring.

As one moral theologian puts it:

“The malice of sodomy consists in the perverted affection towards the wrong sex or in the attraction towards the wrong method of sexual gratification”

(Rev. Heribert Jone, Moral Theology [Westminster, MD: The Newman Press, 1962], n. 230.2; italic and bold print given).

By telling Cruz that his perverted inclinations are created by God and that he should happily embrace them, Francis is implicitly encouraging the man to act on them, for it makes no sense to say that such inclinations are good and God-given and a way to happiness, yet there is no licit way to act on them.

In many cases it may very well be true that people who find themselves sexually attracted to people of the same sex have felt this way from the beginning of their lives and through no fault of their own. But that doesn’t mean that such attraction to the same sex is not wrong. It is still wrong; it is still disordered; it must still be resisted with the help of divine grace. As long as there is no consent of the will, there is no sin. But the fact remains that sexual attraction to the same sex is an evil. By analogy, someone may have been afflicted with diabetes from birth, without any fault of his own; but this does not mean that diabetes is not a disease, that it need not be treated, or that certain foods or situations need not be avoided in order to prevent the condition from doing harm to body or soul.

In Cruz’s case, it seems plausible that his same-sex attraction affliction has its origin in the frightening abuse he suffered at the hands of Fr. Karadima. It is a great tragedy! By telling Cruz that God approves of his same-sex attraction, Francis does not only blaspheme God, he also does a great disservice to Cruz. The victim of sex abuse is affirmed in sin, in a lifestyle that will most certainly not lead to happiness, neither in this world nor in the eternal world to come: “As Sodom and Gomorrha, and the neighboring cities, in like manner, having given themselves to fornication, and going after other flesh, were made an example, suffering the punishment of eternal fire” (Jude 7). Francis is thus once again scandalizing souls, leading them to eternal ruin under the mask of charity. In fact, one may truthfully say that Francis is thus “finishing the job” Karadima started, the job of destroying Cruz’s soul. 

People who suffer from sexual attraction to members of their own sex ought to be helped overcome this inclination, which, especially with the help of divine grace, can certainly be accomplished. The Dutch psychologist Dr. Gerard J. M. van den Aardweg has written a practical guide that is very accessible to the average reader, entitled The Battle for Normality: A Guide for (Self-)Therapy for Homosexuality

[San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1997]. (Disclaimer: Van den Aardweg is said to be linked to the Novus Ordo cult Opus Dei, so we urge caution in the reading of any of his works.)

To be reminded of how serious of an issue all this is, we need but have a look at Pope St. Peter’s summary of the consequences of persisting in sexual sin:

The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly from temptation, but to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be tormented. And especially them who walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness, and despise government, audacious, self willed, they fear not to bring in sects, blaspheming. Whereas angels who are greater in strength and power, bring not against themselves a railing judgment. But these men, as irrational beasts, naturally tending to the snare and to destruction, blaspheming those things which they know not, shall perish in their corruption, receiving the reward of their injustice, counting for a pleasure the delights of a day: stains and spots, sporting themselves to excess, rioting in their feasts with you: Having eyes full of adultery and of sin that ceaseth not: alluring unstable souls, having their heart exercised with covetousness, children of malediction: Leaving the right way they have gone astray, having followed the way of Balaam of Bosor, who loved the wages of iniquity, but had a check of his madness, the dumb beast used to the yoke, which speaking with man’s voice, forbade the folly of the prophet. These are fountains without water, and clouds tossed with whirlwinds, to whom the mist of darkness is reserved.

(2 Pet 2:9-17)

If God is the originator of homosexuality, as Francis maintains, then it follows either that God condones it, which is plainly contrary to Divine Revelation, or else that God is cruel and unjust, condemning people to hell for sins which He Himself approves of. Which of these two blasphemous ideas is the one Bergoglio desires to instill in souls, is obvious.

But there is more at stake here than “only” the immediate issue of whether God creates some people as being attracted to members of the same sex or not. By blasphemously making God the cause of homosexual attraction, Francis is providing the premise for all sorts of theological havoc that can — and will! — be exploited in due time by people seeking to advance the sodomite/LGBTQXYZ agenda. It is clear that his remarks legitimize, in principle, the entire absurd gender ideology which is currently making inroads into Western societies (for an overview of “genderism”.

Do not be misled: Although Francis has verbally condemned the gender madness as “demonic”, such rare reproofs will not be able to stop what follows logically from his erroneous premises. Ideas have consequences. Verbally complaining about such consequences does not deprive them of their force. Francis knows that, and counts on it.

This is a proven and effective method of spreading soul-destroying error: Instill dangerous and harmful premises in people’s minds, and let them draw the necessary conclusions. Once they are drawn, speak out against the conclusions while continuing, however, to affirm the premises that lead to them. Thus you will have firmly established false ideas in people’s minds and yet retain the semblance of opposing them. It is a masterful trick that allows the wolf to appear like a sheep while devouring the lambs.

For those who may think that we’re taking this all a bit too far or blowing it out of proportion, we would like to remind everyone of how much the Novus Ordo Sect has already conceded to the sodomite establishment and helped advance their cause.

The ramifications this latest Bergoglian rubbish will have on the Novus Ordo Church and society cannot yet be estimated.

People have said that this rubbish will bring down the house on Novus Ordo Religion! But that cannot be true!

The Novus Ordo land will remain as it is. People will continue to call Francis “pope”, “Holy Father,” “papa”, “Vicar of Christ”!

This is presented so that those confused within Novus Ordo will know that the religion headed by Francis is not the Catholic Church of Our Lord Jesus Christ!

Presented by Malachy Igwilo (most part culled from www.novusordowatch.com), Ember day 23rd May 2018.