Mr. Bergoglio who goes
by the name Francis has told a homosexual that he should not worry that God
created him that way. In order word, God
made some people homosexual and so they can go on and commit the sin of
homosexuality as they please!
So we finally have an
impostor, claiming to have Papal authority, who has come out to support
homosexuality openly without hiding like Paul VI (an actual homosexual) John Paul
II and Benedict XVI.
This statement is not
shocking to anyone who knows the false religion called Novus Ordo/Vatican II
religion! This religion which the world thinks is the Catholic Church is out to
send the whole world population to hell. That is the plan so there is nothing
shocking about what Francis has said!
The Novus Ordo “canon
law” compiled by the evil entity, John Paul II said that homosexuality is a
disorder. Ask yourself why did he not say that homosexuality is a mortal sin?
It is because they are planning to enthrone this grievous sin.
Francis has
historically refused to condemn this grievous sin. He was presented some time
ago with evidence that one of his henchmen was involved in homosexual ring, he
said he cannot judge!
His “who am I to judge”
statement endeared him to world’s homosexual band and he won “man of the year”
title for many homosexual magazines!
When the new broke that
Italian police broke up a homosexual party inside the Vatican, involving high-ranking
“cardinals” and Vatican workers, he said absolutely nothing about it and the
case was never heard of, again.
There is no doubt that
many in Novus Ordo will dismiss this as a non-issue since it is public
knowledge that homosexual relations are rife within the hierarchy of the Novus
Ordo/Vatican II religion!
When the Vatican press office
was asked to clarify what Francis told this homosexual man, the office claimed
that they cannot comment on Francis’ personal conversation! Perfect!
The reason for this
piece is to remind everyone reading this that the doctrines of Novus Ordo
religion are NOT Catholic doctrines and those who think Francis is pope and his
religion catholic are mistaken!
Francis’ words verbatim,
translated from Spanish, were:
“Juan Carlos, that you
are gay does not matter. God made you like that and he loves you like that and
I do not care. The Pope loves you as you are, you have to be happy with
who you are”
(translation by The Telegraph; Spanish original as reported in El País: “Juan
Carlos, que tú seas gay no importa. Dios te hizo así y te quiere así y a mí no
me importa. El Papa te quiere así, tú tienes que estar feliz con quien tú
eres”).
These words are
seriously wrong on many different levels.
First, the very idea of being gay,
as it is called, is flawed. Sexual orientation is a made-up notion
that does not reflect any reality. We cannot provide an in-depth critique of
this now, but suffice it to say that while it is clear that there can be an
experience of sexual attraction between members of the same sex, all
sexuality is, by its very nature, oriented towards the other sex.
That is how God made
it, and He did so for the sole primary purpose of procreation: “And
God created man to his own image: to the image of God he created him: male and
female he created them. And God blessed them, saying: Increase and multiply,
and fill the earth, and subdue it…” (Gen 1:27-28).
Although there are many
different kinds of sins against purity, any sexual act that defeats this
procreative purpose is among the most heinous: “Worst among the sins of
impurity, as such, are crimes of unnatural lust, for they exercise the sexual
act, not only illicitly, but also in a manner that defeats its purpose of
reproduction”
(Rev. John A. McHugh
& Rev. Charles J. Callan, Moral Theology, vol. 2 [New York, NY: Joseph F.
Wagner, 1958], n. 2534; available online here.)
Second, by saying that
God is the cause of same-sex attraction in Juan Carlos Cruz, Francis is
blaspheming the Creator, for God desires all to be saved (see 1 Tim 2:4) and
is not the cause of sin, which He hates: “In the morning I will stand
before thee, and will see: because thou art not a God that willest iniquity…”
(Ps 5:5);
“But to God the wicked
and his wickedness are hateful alike” (Wis 14:9); “Say not: He hath caused me
to err: for he hath no need of wicked men. The Lord hateth all abomination of
error, and they that fear him shall not love it” (Ecclus [Sir] 15:12-13).
That God condemns
sodomy as sinful should hardly require proof: “Thou shalt not lie
with mankind as with womankind, because it is an abomination” (Lev 18:22); “Nor
the effeminate, nor liers with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor
drunkards, nor railers, nor extortioners, shall possess the kingdom of God” (1
Cor 6:10).
Third, by telling Cruz
that God loves his being sexually attracted to men, Francis is saying
that God loves homosexuality, another staggering blasphemy and heresy that
surely needs no further comment.
Fourth, Francis says,
“I do not care.” That is the only part of his remarks that one can believe
wholeheartedly. When it comes to matters of Faith and morals and to the
salvation of souls, we can be certain that Francis doesn’t give a hoot. Truer
words have never been spoken.
Fifth, even if it were
not sinful to hold that God is the cause of same-sex attraction in sodomites,
there is simply no way Francis could possibly know that God “made”
Juan Cruz this way. There is neither divine revelation nor empirical science to
that effect.
For example, consider
the expert opinion of Dr. Rudolf Allers, M.D., Ph.D. (1883-1963): “Obviously
it is not an innate perversion which is unavoidable and for which there is no
remedy. In many cases the mental background is easily discovered; in others the
task is extremely difficult” (Dr. Rudolf Allers, Sex
Psychology [Fort Collins, CO: Roman Catholic Books, 2006], p. 163;
imprimatur 1937). Allers taught psychology at the Catholic University of
America and “acted for seven years as an expert in the Ecclesiastical Court
especially in matrimonial cases”
(Matthew Hoehn, ed., Catholic Authors: Contemporary Biographical Sketches 1930-1947 [Newark,
NJ: St. Mary’s Abbey, 1948], p. 7).
The very fact that
human beings have wicked desires does not mean they are allowed to
indulge in them. All sins and sinful inclinations have their root in original sin.
Concupiscence, which is the continual inclination to do what is wrong, is one
of the effects of original sin, and it is not wiped out by
baptism. We must continually struggle to overcome concupiscence; hence the need
for penance, mortification, prayer, and good works, all made fruitful and
meritorious by the help of God’s grace.
But Francis, being a
Naturalist, denies original sin and/or its consequences. He may pay lip
service to the true Catholic teaching, but in practice he denies it. We see
this in his claim that somebody’s same-sex attraction is not an evil that must
be disapproved of and fought (as must other inclinations to evil, whether that
be adultery, covetousness, blasphemy, pride, detraction, or anything else) but
is a good that God has implanted in him and is no cause for concern,
disapproval, or shame. In his comment to Cruz, Francis is explicitly
encouraging those afflicted with same-sex attraction to embrace this
inclination as good and desired, nay created, by God Himself, and that he
should be happy in it! What an audacious blasphemy!
St. Paul the Apostle,
inspired by God Himself, had a different take on this. In his letter to the
Romans he put things in perspective:
Wherefore God gave them
up to the desires of their heart, unto uncleanness, to dishonor their own
bodies among themselves. Who changed the truth of God into a lie; and
worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever.
Amen. For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For
their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature.
And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have
burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is
filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their
error. And as they liked not to have God in their knowledge, God delivered them
up to a reprobate sense, to do those things which are not convenient; being
filled with all iniquity, malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness, full of
envy, murder, contention, deceit, malignity, whisperers, detractors, hateful to
God, contumelious, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
foolish, dissolute, without affection, without fidelity, without mercy. Who,
having known the justice of God, did not understand that they who do such
things, are worthy of death; and not only they that do them, but they also that
consent to them that do them.
(Rom 1:24-32)
We must be clear that
merely experiencing same-sex attraction is not sinful — sin is an act
of the will, not a feeling. What is sinful is consenting to it, approving of
it, acting on it, and claiming that such attraction is normal, legitimate,
or healthy. It’s sinful because sexual attraction exists for sexual acts,
and the primary purpose of sexuality is procreation, something that is
intrinsically frustrated in unnatural acts.
Unnatural acts are, in
the truest sense of the word, a perversion, meaning a turning away from
the proper end (the Latin pervertere literally means “to turn to ill
effect”). They are an abuse of the faculties God gave to man so he could
produce offspring.
As one moral theologian
puts it:
“The malice of
sodomy consists in the perverted affection towards the wrong sex or in the
attraction towards the wrong method of sexual gratification”
(Rev. Heribert
Jone, Moral Theology [Westminster, MD: The Newman Press,
1962], n. 230.2; italic and bold print given).
By telling Cruz that
his perverted inclinations are created by God and that he should happily
embrace them, Francis is implicitly encouraging the man to act on
them, for it makes no sense to say that such inclinations are good and
God-given and a way to happiness, yet there is no licit way to act on them.
In many cases it may
very well be true that people who find themselves sexually attracted to people
of the same sex have felt this way from the beginning of their lives and
through no fault of their own. But that doesn’t mean that such attraction to
the same sex is not wrong. It is still wrong; it is still disordered; it must
still be resisted with the help of divine grace. As long as there is no consent
of the will, there is no sin. But the fact remains that sexual attraction to
the same sex is an evil. By analogy, someone may have been afflicted with
diabetes from birth, without any fault of his own; but this does not mean that
diabetes is not a disease, that it need not be treated, or that certain foods
or situations need not be avoided in order to prevent the condition from doing
harm to body or soul.
In Cruz’s case, it
seems plausible that his same-sex attraction affliction has its origin in the
frightening abuse he suffered at the hands of Fr. Karadima. It is a great
tragedy! By telling Cruz that God approves of his same-sex attraction, Francis
does not only blaspheme God, he also does a great disservice to Cruz. The
victim of sex abuse is affirmed in sin, in a lifestyle that will most certainly
not lead to happiness, neither in this world nor in the eternal world to come:
“As Sodom and Gomorrha, and the neighboring cities, in like manner, having
given themselves to fornication, and going after other flesh, were made an
example, suffering the punishment of eternal fire” (Jude 7). Francis is
thus once again scandalizing souls, leading them to eternal ruin
under the mask of charity. In fact, one may truthfully say that Francis is thus
“finishing the job” Karadima started, the job of destroying Cruz’s soul.
People who suffer from
sexual attraction to members of their own sex ought to be helped overcome this
inclination, which, especially with the help of divine grace, can certainly be
accomplished. The Dutch psychologist Dr. Gerard J. M. van den Aardweg has
written a practical guide that is very accessible to the average reader,
entitled The Battle for Normality: A Guide for (Self-)Therapy for
Homosexuality
[San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1997]. (Disclaimer: Van
den Aardweg is said to be linked to the Novus Ordo cult Opus Dei, so we
urge caution in the reading of any of his works.)
To be reminded of how
serious of an issue all this is, we need but have a look at Pope St. Peter’s
summary of the consequences of persisting in sexual sin:
The Lord knoweth how to
deliver the godly from temptation, but to reserve the unjust unto the day of
judgment to be tormented. And especially them who walk after the flesh in the
lust of uncleanness, and despise government, audacious, self willed, they fear
not to bring in sects, blaspheming. Whereas angels who are greater in strength
and power, bring not against themselves a railing judgment. But these men, as
irrational beasts, naturally tending to the snare and to destruction,
blaspheming those things which they know not, shall perish in their corruption,
receiving the reward of their injustice, counting for a pleasure the delights
of a day: stains and spots, sporting themselves to excess, rioting in their
feasts with you: Having eyes full of adultery and of sin that ceaseth not:
alluring unstable souls, having their heart exercised with covetousness,
children of malediction: Leaving the right way they have gone astray, having
followed the way of Balaam of Bosor, who loved the wages of iniquity, but had a
check of his madness, the dumb beast used to the yoke, which speaking with
man’s voice, forbade the folly of the prophet. These are fountains without
water, and clouds tossed with whirlwinds, to whom the mist of darkness is
reserved.
(2 Pet 2:9-17)
If God is the
originator of homosexuality, as Francis maintains, then it follows either that
God condones it, which is plainly contrary to Divine Revelation, or else that
God is cruel and unjust, condemning people to hell for sins which He Himself
approves of. Which of these two blasphemous ideas is the one Bergoglio desires
to instill in souls, is obvious.
But there is more at
stake here than “only” the immediate issue of whether God creates some people
as being attracted to members of the same sex or not. By blasphemously
making God the cause of homosexual attraction, Francis is providing the premise
for all sorts of theological havoc that can — and will! — be exploited in due
time by people seeking to advance the sodomite/LGBTQXYZ agenda. It is clear
that his remarks legitimize, in principle, the entire absurd gender
ideology which is currently making inroads into Western societies (for an
overview of “genderism”.
Do not be misled:
Although Francis has verbally condemned the gender madness as “demonic”, such
rare reproofs will not be able to stop what follows logically from his
erroneous premises. Ideas have consequences. Verbally complaining about
such consequences does not deprive them of their force. Francis knows that, and
counts on it.
This is a proven and
effective method of spreading soul-destroying error: Instill dangerous and
harmful premises in people’s minds, and let them draw the necessary
conclusions. Once they are drawn, speak out against the conclusions while
continuing, however, to affirm the premises that lead to them. Thus you will
have firmly established false ideas in people’s minds and yet retain the
semblance of opposing them. It is a masterful trick that allows the wolf to
appear like a sheep while devouring the lambs.
For those who may think
that we’re taking this all a bit too far or blowing it out of proportion, we
would like to remind everyone of how much the Novus Ordo Sect has already
conceded to the sodomite establishment and helped advance their cause.
The ramifications this
latest Bergoglian rubbish will have on the Novus Ordo Church and society cannot
yet be estimated.
People have said that
this rubbish will bring down the house on Novus Ordo Religion! But that cannot
be true!
The Novus Ordo land
will remain as it is. People will continue to call Francis “pope”, “Holy
Father,” “papa”, “Vicar of Christ”!
This is presented so
that those confused within Novus Ordo will know that the religion headed by
Francis is not the Catholic Church of Our Lord Jesus Christ!
Presented by Malachy
Igwilo (most part culled from www.novusordowatch.com),
Ember day 23rd May 2018.
No comments:
Post a Comment