We must all be reminded of who
Francis is and his mission in his last “encyclical”, Amoris Laetitia. The writer, Atila Sinke Guimarães x-rayed the
content of this evil document to show once again that Francis’ utterances is
Demonic and those who calling him “pope” and other holy names are just fooling
themselves.
As the deceived world wonder about
why Francis said that co-habitation has the grace of marriage, we must not
forget that Francis’ writing of Amoris Laetitia
was a show of his evil mentalities!
Yet people did not really read what
the man wrote. If people have read the poison with any Catholic sense, the
shock following his latest heresy and promotion of evil will not be this
obvious.
Let us look at some of the contents
presented by Francis in his Amoris Laetitia
which is already being forgotten but which Francis is using as a basis for his
evil magisterium!
Introducing married priests
Although the moral points addressed by Amoris laetitia (AL) are very significant, as I will confirm later, I believe that, institutionally speaking, it lays the foundation for the end of priestly celibacy as no other anti-papal document has done before.
The topic is addressed in passing as Francis deals with the “conversion” of the “Church” in chapter 6:
“The Church is required to have a
missionary conversion: She must not close herself in a merely theoretical
message, disengaged from the real problems of people.” (No. 201)
Then, he goes on to command a new
formation for priests:
“Along with a pastoral
specifically oriented toward families, we envisage the need for a more adequate
formation of priests, deacons, religious men and women, catechists and
other pastoral workers. In the replies given to the consultations sent
worldwide, it was revealed that ordained ministers often lack an adequate
formation to deal with the complex contemporary problems of families. In this
sense, also the experience of the long Eastern tradition of married priests can
be useful.” (No. 202)
So far, Bergoglio declares the need
for a new formation for priests in order to better understand modern families
and he points to the model of married priests of the Eastern rites, who,
supposedly, already have this formation.
The rest of the plan is revealed when, in the next paragraph, Francis addresses the formation of the seminarians who will be tomorrow's priests. He says:
The rest of the plan is revealed when, in the next paragraph, Francis addresses the formation of the seminarians who will be tomorrow's priests. He says:
“Seminarians must have access to
a broader interdisciplinary formation, not just doctrinal, in the areas of
engagement and marriage. Their formation not always allows them to express
their own psychological and affective world. Some bear the experience of their
own wounded families, with the absence of parents and emotional instability. It
is necessary to ensure that maturity is reached during their formation so that
future ministers have the psychological equilibrium that their mission demands.
Family bonds are essential to reinforce a healthy self-esteem in the
seminarians. It is important for families to be a part of the entire process
from seminary to priesthood, since they help to strengthen them in a realistic
way.
“In this sense it is helpful for
seminarians to combine time in the seminary with time spent in parishes
that can give them more contact with the concrete realities of family life,
since in their entire future pastoral life the priests will be dealing with
families. In the formation of the priest, the presence of lay people and
families, and especially the feminine presence, promotes an appreciation of
the diversity and complementarity of the different vocations in the Church.”
(No. 203)
Thus, the plan is laid out:
Seminarians should be welcomed as guests for periods of times in family homes
with the “feminine presence” so that they can “strengthen their self-esteem”
and are allowed “to express their own psychological and affective world.” All
this should be done taking into consideration “the experience of the long
Eastern tradition of married priests.”
What does this mean except that the
door was opened for married priests?
Do not imagine that this is a plan
for a remote future. It is already being executed right now, as can be verified
in the Kansas City area by the Fraternity of St. Peter with its young
seminarians. In fact, recently they were sent into family homes with the
feminine presence - wives and beautiful daughters, who received them warmly and
had parties for them. This is just one known case know. How many others are there around the US
and the world?
Along the same lines of promoting married priests, in other
texts of AL, Pope Bergoglio disparages priestly celibacy: “John Paul II
affirmed that the biblical texts give no reason to assert the ‘inferiority’ of
marriage, nor the ‘superiority’ of virginity or celibacy based on sexual
abstinence.” (No. 159)
This is a blatant error that goes
against both Scripture and Tradition. Nonetheless, Francis says:
“Therefore, it is not the case to diminish the value of
marriage in favor of continence. There is no basis for a supposed
contra-positioning of one against the other. ... If, adhering to a certain
tradition, one speaks of a ‘state of perfection,’ this has to do not with
continence itself, but with regard to a life lived according to the evangelical
counsels. Nonetheless, a married person can live the highest degree of
charity.” (No. 160)
These are the texts that signal a green light to seminarians
looking for a good wife to engage in a social life with young women. I believe
that “Cardinal” Walter Kasper was referring to this new position when he stated
that this document would introduce the beginning of a Revolution that would
change 1700 years of the Catholic Church. We are witnessing the call for the
end of priestly celibacy.
Apocalyptic morality
Regarding morals, AL tolerates absolutely all
perversions – called “irregular situations” or “situations of frailty” – by
recommending priests and lay people to welcome these persons into parish life
and, at times, to Communion. These include homosexuals, persons who engage in
pre-marital sex, unmarried cohabitating couples, civilly divorced and
“remarried” couples, single mothers, as well as other public sinners whose
lives, thus far, the Church considered scandalous. Francis demands that no past
moral rules should be applied to them.
Here is a list of quotes from AL where
Francis frontally denies Catholic Morals in dealing with regular or “irregular”
situations follows:
- No more “general norms” (No.
2);
- no “abstract texts” (No. 22);
- no “discriminating forms and
models of the past” (No. 32);
- no “rhetorical denunciations of
present day evils” (No. 35);
- no “abstract theological ideal
of marriage” (No.36);
- no “imposition of a series of
stone-like norms” (No. 49);
- no “defense of a cold and
lifeless doctrine” (No. 59);
- no “talk of indissolubility as
an obligation” (No. 134);
- no “moralizing language” (No. 139);
- no “theoretical and unconnected
messages” or “presentation of a set of rules” (No. 201);
- no teaching fiancés the
“complete Catechism,” overwhelming them with “too much information” (No.
207), or saturating them with “doctrinal convictions” (No. 211);
- no “pastoral of small elites”
(No. 230);
- no “imposition of an
indisputable truth” (No. 264);
- no “application of rigid and
immutable methods” (No. 273);
- no manifestation “of authority
and norms” (No. 288);
- no “judgment of a person’s
guilt [in an ‘irregular’ situation]” (No. 302);
- no “petty consideration that
the actions of a [cohabitating] person must correspond to a law or rule”
(No. 304);
- no “application of moral laws
to those living in ‘irregular’ situations, as if they were stones to be
thrown against persons” (No. 305);
- no “cold bureaucratic morality
in dealing with more sensitive issues” (No. 312);
- no ‘harsh judgments about those
who live in situations of great frailty” (No. 325).
This list configures a great hatred
for Catholic Morals as it was always taught by Holy Mother Church. It also characterizes
a new religion of tolerance. Every vice and every evil is tolerated.
Then, anti-pope Francis issues this astounding principle that summarizes the Demonic spirit of Amoris laetitia:
“It is no longer possible to say
that all those who live in a so-called ‘irregular’ situation are living in a
state of mortal sin and are deprived of sanctifying grace.” (No. 301)
He
finally defines his new religion:
“I sincerely believe that Jesus
wants a Church attentive to the goodness which the Spirit sows in the midst of
human frailty: a Mother who, even while she expresses her objective
teaching, always does what good she can, even if in the process, she runs
the risk of dirtying herself with the mud of the street.” (No. 308)
We have, then, seen that Francis’ Demonic religion of Novus Ordo has been transformed by AL into a mammoth house of tolerance. Incidentally, in Portuguese, “house of tolerance” is the scholarly and juridical name for a house of prostitution. Francis transforms the his religion into the “habitation of devils and the hold of every unclean spirit, and the hold of every unclean and hateful bird.” (Apoc 18:2)
This
coincidence evokes the figure that St. John, the Apostle of love, warned us
would appear in times to come: A great harlot offering the entire world a
golden cup that contains the “wine of her prostitution.” (cf. Apoc 17:2, 4;
18:3) I ask: Is not the apostate post-conciliar Rome the prostitute? Is not Amoris
laetitia the cup containing the “wine of prostitution,” which is this
tolerance being offered to corrupt what is left of morality in the entire
world?
Presented
by Malachy Mary Igwilo, on the Eve of the Feast of St. John the Baptist,in the year of the Lord 23rd June 2016
Related
post of Interest:
No comments:
Post a Comment