I hope you have duly noted the inverted comas on
this topic? The inverted commas are there on the title ‘pope’ and ‘pope emeritus’
because the two men in question, Mr. Jorg Bergoglio and Josef Ratzinger are NOT
Catholics and so can never be referred to as ‘popes’!
Ask yourself: Can a non-Catholic be pope?
The two men are agents of the Devil! The ONLY difference
between the two is that Francis is not pretending. He is open to his calling
which is to destroy millions of souls, sending them to hell!
Benedict XVI on the other hand is a great pretender!
He and Francis want the same thing. But Benedict pretends that he is holy and
is a conservative Catholic and many are actually deceived into thinking him so!
For a refresher course of who Benedict XVI truly, read this article here and watch the video here
Now a rift has grown between the two evil men!
Francis is a shipwreck moving so fast towards the actualizing the intensions of
the Devil. Benedict XVI seems not to like this fast moving train which is
heading to hell.
Benedict XVI prefers that the Train is moving very
slowly towards hell but no one inside the train should know about this movement
to hell!
John Paul II, the great apostate perfected mixing
the two: he operated a fast moving train towards hell and at the same time
operated another slow moving train within the fast moving one! Talk of the evil
genius!
Anyway, the fact is that Francis does not talk to
Benedict for any reason. The only time they talk is when Francis ORDERS
Benedict XVI to some public function. The old man, Benedict, will appear with
fake smile and Francis will reciprocate with another fake smile. After the event
the two will retire and continue to loath each other.
This lack of verbal communication between these two
scions of the Devil has been confirmed by a respected Vatican insider!
It has to be true for him to say such a thing in
public. But the evil Vatican will now swing into action to do some damage
control! It is likely they will dismiss this and call for some photo op between
the two evil men.
Andreas Englisch is Germany’s most
celebrated Vatican insider and “papal” biographer. He does not speak
carelessly. He words are weighty! So, in a lecture given on March 16, 2017
in Limburg (the diocesan headquarters where Benedict appointee “Bishop”
Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst was removed by Francis in 2014), Englisch
made some explosive claims about the relationship between the “Pope” and
the “Pope Emeritus”: The two men are at complete odds with each other
and are no longer on speaking terms; Benedict XVI only makes a public
appearance when Francis orders him to’. Englisch also said some interesting things
about Benedict XVI’s resignation from his false papacy! There are interesting times
for Novus Ordo religion people!
I suggest you buy more popcorn! More action coming
from this grand false religion! Watch!
Here is how it was reported by Giuseppe Nardi, a
journalist at the German periodical Katholisches, of Mar. 20, 2017. The
translation was made by Novusordowatch.
Andreas
Englisch: Pope Francis and Benedict are at complete odds with each other
Pope Francis and his predecessor Benedict XVI are
reportedly in complete disagreement: “They do not speak a word with one
another.” This is the startling message which Vaticanist Andreas Englisch
presented on March 16 during a lecture in Limburg. For many years, Englisch was
the Italy and Vatican correspondent for the [German] Axel Springer media
conglomerate in Rome. With 30 years of experience in Rome, he is considered to
be a renowned Vatican expert. At [Limburg’s] Josef Kohlmaier Hall Englisch told
the inside story on the topic of “Francis – Fighter in the Vatican” [the title
of his latest book], according to a March 18 report of the Nassauische
Neue Post [newspaper]. The look behind the scenes at the Vatican
which Englisch offered his audience was even more dramatic than
the Nassauische Neue Post conveyed in its article.
“Francis
and Benedict do not speak a word with each other”
It was not necessary for the journalist to hide his
esteem for Francis, which is well-known already. Englisch knows how to
fascinate his audience. Yes, Bishop Tebartz-van Elst has a new job at the
Vatican, he said, at the “post office” — because under Pope Francis, that’s all
there is for people who “put themselves above the doctrine of Jesus Christ and
do not interact with the common faithful at eye level.” [These are] daring
statements — by Englisch about the Pope and by the Pope about a brother bishop.
What Englisch didn’t say: Who is suited for nothing
more than the “post office” is not so much determined by real or imagined
“golden bathtubs” [which Tebartz-van Elst was rumored to have purchased before
his removal] than by one’s ideas about the Church. The social component
with its myth about commitment for the poor is always well received by a
public audience, but it is not very meaningful in terms of the actual issue;
rather, it makes matters more obscure.
What’s more explosive — because it’s of much greater
significance in its extent — than the Limburg case is what Englisch said about
the relationship between Francis and Benedict XVI: The current and the former
Pope have completely logged heads, he claimed, [adding that] the two are no
longer on speaking terms. And that [has been the case] not just since
yesterday.
What does this mean? According to his own testimony,
Benedict XVI only appears in public at Francis’ express request. What
is displayed on these few occasions, then — if we follow Andreas
Englisch — is simply [Benedict] putting up a good front, with an exchange
of pleasantries. Englisch mentions the Limburg case as the reason for the rift,
in which Benedict reportedly intervened to get Bishop Tebartz-van Elst to
stay [in office as the bishop of Limburg]. That is one aspect at
best. Limburg is certainly not the main reason for such a
fundamental break in the relationship between two Popes.
Francis
“knows what he wants” and does “what he wants”
The Rome correspondent described Francis as a
strong personality. He “knows what he wants” and makes it known. Benedict, by
contrast, is a “solid theologian”, but was a “weak leader”, Englisch said.
For decades, however, this sounded quite different
when in the German media the talk was always about the “tough armored
cardinal” [“harten Panzerkardinal“]. In order to push a certain narrative,
it seems that at any given time more or less anything goes, back then as
well as today.
In any case, Englisch says, Benedict allowed many
others to make decisions, whereas Pope Francis does “whatever he wants”.
If we reflect on Englisch’s testimony, this
would mean that Benedict XVI was publicly demoted to [the role of] a mere
supernumerary who barely has anything in common with Francis, but whom Francis
needs every so often for the sake of [good] appearance, and whom he
deploys as needed. Against this background, Benedict’s absence for the
most recent elevation of cardinals on November 19 appears of greater
significance. Francis’ creation of cardinals belongs to those few events
for which the current Pope calls his predecessor to appear in public.
Benedict XVI appeared at St. Peter’s Basilica
for the elevation of cardinals in 2014 and 2015. For the third elevation,
however, he was missing, whereupon Francis took the new cardinals and quickly
drove them over to [see] Benedict at the Mater Ecclesiae monastery.
Apparently [he did this] also in order to preventatively ward off the kind of
conclusions which Englisch has now drawn. Francis apparently suspects a
demonstrative act [on Benedict’s part] behind his no-show.
Pressure on Benedict XVI to resign
In any case, the timing does not suggest
it was a courtesy visit, which is how the Vatican spun it; rather, it was
highly explosive. Five days before the consistory the four
cardinals Brandmüller, Burke, Caffarra, and Meisner had made public
their dubia (doubts) concerning the controversial post-synodal
document Amoris laetitia, because Pope Francis had failed to give them an
answer for two months. With the dubia, they squarely put
themselves in Francis’ way, who has since been trying to ignore the issue,
which has forced his closest collaborators and supporters to [engage
in] sweat-inducing verbal acrobatics. Francis has prevailed with his
[strategy of] silence, yet he emerges weakened from the conflict as a Pope who
refuses to answer questions that concern central issues of faith and morals.
The damage [this has caused to his] image has greatly overshadowed his
pontificate.
What the Nassauische Neue Post did not report:
According to Englisch, different ecclesiastical forces pressured Benedict XVI
to resign.
This statement has explosive force. The
circumstances which led to the papal resignation, in this form quite
unique in Church history, have been feeding serious doubts since then. Exactly
where is the line between legitimate influence and coercion? Benedict himself
has assured [us] that he resigned freely. Until the contrary is proven, these
words retain their validity. At the same time, aside from the legal aspect,
there is a strange stalemate in the air. Even more so if one takes into
consideration Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini’s all-out demand, [made] in June
2012, that Benedict XVI resign, and the role played by the secretive Saint
Gallen group, founded by Martini, at the election of Jorge Mario Bergoglio.
The fact is that Benedict XVI has left the stage, a
stage that was afterwards occupied, like the staff of a military general, by
[members of] Team Bergoglio of the clandestine Saint Gallen group, and which does
not think of leaving it.
(Giuseppe Nardi, “Andreas Englisch: Papst Franziskus und Benedikt haben sich
völlig zerstritten”, Katholisches, Mar. 20, 2017; our translation.)
Here you have read it! The problem is about how to
administer this huge false religion that is sending millions to hell!
If you know anyone remaining in this false religion which
is falsely calling itself the ‘Catholic Church’, it is time you pull that
person out of that burning building, fast!
By Malachy Mary Igwilo, Feast Of the Annunciation,
25th March, 2017
No comments:
Post a Comment